期刊文献+

对“Ego cogito,ergo sum”的两点看法 被引量:1

Two Points of View of "Ego cogito,ergo sum"
原文传递
导出
摘要 “Ego cogito,ergo sum”首次以“哲学的第一原理”的名义出现,是在1637年的《方法谈》中。在对一系列事物进行怀疑之后,笛卡尔写道:“我曾想要认为一切都是假的,在这个过程中,那个曾在想的我,必然应当是某个东西”(Descartes,1996,VI,P.32),由此,他认为找到了一条不可怀疑的真理——“我思,我是”。然而, This paper presents an attempt to show that according to Descartes'viewpoint in his maturity,'ego cogito,ergo sum' is illustrated by means of treating the universal doubt as a linguistic structure with two different layers.Such a double-layer structure is capable of incorporating ego into the examination of doubt process;and in this way internal structure and the diachronic nature of introspection can be unveiled.Moreover,this structure not only enables the discovery of the absolute truth of 'I' being existing,but also an inference that such a truth is indemonstrable.This two,following a research of Qian Jie,form the very reason that 'ego cogito,ergo sum' is a kind of intuition a priori.It also points out that the equivalence of 'sum' and 'existo' is not realized via an epistemological approach,but rather via God as a dynamical cause.Therefore,given this 'first principle' that only derived from an epistemological process,a more proper translation of 'ego cogito,ergo sum' is suggested to be 'I think,I am'.
作者 吴童立
机构地区 南开大学哲学系
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期69-74,共6页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1钱捷.悖论与真理[J].哲学研究,2000(5):62-69. 被引量:3
  • 2Descartes, 1970, Philosophical letters, translated and edited by Anthony Kenny, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 3Descartes,1975, Entretien avec Burman, traduit et annote par CH. Adam, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
  • 4Descartes,1996, Oeuvres de Descartes, Paris: Publiees par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery.
  • 5Flage, Daniel E. and Bonnen, Clarence A. , 1999, Descartes and Method: a Search for a Method in Meditations, London and New York: Routledge Press.
  • 6Hintikka, Jakko, 1962, "Cogito, ergo sum : inference or performance?" in the Philosophy Review 71 ( 1 ).
  • 7Leyden, W. von, 1962-1963, "Cogito, ergo sum", in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New series 63.
  • 8Marion, J. -L. , 1999, Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Popkin, Richard, 2003, The History of Skepticism-from Savonarola to Bayle, Oxford : Oxford University Press.

共引文献2

同被引文献9

  • 1Plato,Republic[M].copyrigt(c)1993Robin Water field Reprinted from the English Edition by Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 2R.descartes,Meditations[M].copyrigt(c)1986by Cambridge University Press Reprinted from the English Edition by Cambridge University Press,1993.
  • 3笛卡儿.第一哲学深思集[M].庞景仁,译.北京:商务印书馆,1998.
  • 4Kant.Critique Of Pure Reason[M].Reprinted from the English Editio by the Macmillan Press Ltd,1933.
  • 5黑格尔.哲学史讲演录:第四卷[M].贺鳞,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:71.
  • 6R.descartes.Discourse on Method[M].Harvard Classics,Edited by W.eliot.沈阳:万卷出版公司,2006:25.
  • 7笛卡儿.谈谈方法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:50.
  • 8柏拉图.柏拉图对话集[M].王太庆译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.337.
  • 9胡塞尔.笛卡儿式的沉思[M].张廷国,译.北京:中国城市出版社,2002.

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部