期刊文献+

我国上市公司股权结构对现金股利政策的影响——基于股权分置改革前后的实证研究 被引量:43

An Empirical Study on Relationship of Shareholding Structure and Dividend Payout Policy in China's Listed Companies——Before and After Non-tradable Shares Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于中国股权分置改革的特殊制度背景,以中国上市公司为样本,就股权结构对现金股利政策的影响进行了实证分析。实证结果发现,绝对控股结构的公司在股权分置改革前后一直存在现金股利的"隧道效应";而在股权制衡结构的公司中,大股东之间的相互监督和制衡有效限制了控股股东对中小股东的利益侵占行为;股权分置改革前后,不同股权结构上市公司的股利支付水平和稳定性也存在差异。因此,上市公司股权结构的合理化调整应成为保护中小投资者利益的重要手段。 Taking the non-tradable shares reform into consideration, the paper gave an empirical study on the relationship of shareholding structure and dividend payout policy in China's listed companies, after which we drew the following conclusions. Firstly, when a company was absolutely controlled there was always a tunneling on dividend payout policies. Secondly, when a company was restrictively controlled, other large shareholders would play a supervision role and the tunneling on dividend payout policy by the controlling shareholders would be somehow restricted. Thirdly, changes were observed before and after the non-tradable shares reform: the dividend payout rate was increased, and the characteristics of the three types of companies with different shareholding structures appeared themselves after the reform.
作者 许文彬 刘猛
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期128-138,共11页 China Industrial Economics
关键词 股权结构 现金股利政策 股权分置改革 实证研究 shareholding structure dividend pavout poliey non-tradable shares reform empirieal study
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bennedsen, M.,and D. Wolfenzon. The Balance of Power in Closely Held Corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, (58).
  • 2Black, F. The Dividend Puzzle[J]. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1976,(3).
  • 3Dyck, A., and L. Zingales. Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison [J]. Journal of Finance. 2004, (59).
  • 4Gorden, M. The Savings, Investment and Valuation of a Corporation [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1962, (Feb).
  • 5Grinstein, Y., and R. Miehaely. Institutional Holdings and Payout Policy[J]. Journal of Finance, 2005, (60).
  • 6Gugler, K. Corporate Governance, Dividend Payout Policy, and the Interrelation between Dividends, R&D, and Capital Investment[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2003, (27).
  • 7Gugler, K., and B. Yurtoglu. Corporate Governance and Dividend Pay-out Policy in Germany [J]. European Economic Review, 2003, (47).
  • 8Jensen, M. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2).
  • 9Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. Tunneling [J]. American Economic Review, 2000(90).
  • 10La Porta, R., F. I.opez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance [J]. The Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, (58).

二级参考文献84

  • 1王彬.上市公司与其大股东关系研究[J].证券市场导报,1998(1):39-44. 被引量:22
  • 2唐松华.2002年深市上市公司利润分配状况分析[J].证券市场导报,2003(7):18-21. 被引量:5
  • 3阎大颖.中国上市公司控股股东价值取向对股利政策影响的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2004(6):94-100. 被引量:77
  • 4管汝平.股份回购的管理[J].上市公司,1999,(5).
  • 5原红旗.[D].,1998年.
  • 6[5]Claessens, S., Djankov S., and Lang L.H.P., 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81-112.
  • 7[6]Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60, 2001, PP3-43.
  • 8[7]Grullon, G., Michaely, R., 2002. Dividends, Share Repurchases,and the Substitution Hypothesis. Journal of Finance, VOL. LVⅡ,NO.4, Aug. 2002.
  • 9[8]Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Bbehavior, Aagency Ccosts, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
  • 10[9]La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance 54, 471-517.

共引文献930

同被引文献492

引证文献43

二级引证文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部