期刊文献+

非清髓性同种造血干细胞移植治疗恶性实体瘤13例

Effect of Nonmyeloblative Preconditioning AUogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Malignant Solid Tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨非清髓性同种外周血造血干细胞移植治疗复发及难治性实体瘤的疗效及安全性,并研究移植物抗肿瘤效应(GVT)产生的抗肿瘤免疫效果。方法:13例患者,其中原发不明癌5例,其他经手术,放、化疗治疗后复发及多部位转移,难治性实体瘤8例。年龄17~69岁,中位年龄45岁。ECOG分级:0级5例,1级6例,2、3级各1例。全部患者给予非清髓性预处理方案进行同种外周血造血干细胞移植。供者为HLA完全相合者10例,非血缘关系者3例。ABO血型相合9例,不相合者4例。采集CD34^+数为1.4~6.6×10~6/kg,平均为3.46×10~6/kg。预处理方案三种:供者为同胞的患者采用环磷酰胺+氟达拉宾方案;非血缘供者患者采用氟达拉宾+马法兰方案。移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)防治采用环孢素A或加用甲氨蝶呤。疗效判定以治疗前后肿瘤大小做为移植物抗肿瘤(GVT)效果判定。同时观察同种造血干细胞移植的副作用。结果:全部患者均获造血重建,移植后中性粒细胞>0.5×10~9/L平均时间11.9天,血小板>20×10~9/L平均时间14.9天,不良反应主要表现为胃肠道、皮肤黏膜及神经系统。急性GVHD9例,经治疗后好转。慢性GVHD8例,均为广泛型。GVT效应:1例GVT+++,肿瘤完全消失,无瘤生存887天。3例GVT++,无瘤生存334天。5例GVT+,无瘤生存117~203天。移植效果:以持续3个月以上统计,CR1例,PR2例,SD4例,PD5例,移植相关死亡1例。总有效率为53.8%。不良反应:主要为急性GVHD,表现为胃肠道反应如腹泻,感染等,肝静脉血栓及脑病少见。经对症治疗好转。结论:对复发及难治性实体瘤,特别是原发不明癌采用非清髓性同种外周血造血干细胞移植可提高疗效,并通过移植物抗肿瘤效应使瘤体减小,延长患者生存期、本疗法具有较好的安全性。 Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonmyeloablative preconditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NMHSCT) in the therapy of unidentified relapse and primary solid tumors, and to study the anti-tumor immunity induced by the effect of Graft-Verus-Tumor (GVT). Methods: A total of 13 difficult-to-treat cancer patients received NMSCT and the efficacy and side effects were observed. Results: One case had CR, 2 cases had PR, 4 cases had SD, 5 cases had PD, and 1 case died of complications associated with transplantation. One case was GVT (+++), 3 cases were GVT (++), 5 cases were GVT(+), and 4 cases were GVT (-). The main side effect was acute GVHD presented as diarrhea and infection. VOD and brain disease were rare. Conclusion: Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for solide tumors.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第23期1340-1342,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 恶性实体瘤 非清髓性预处理 同种造血干细胞移植 Tumor/therapy Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

  • 1McLaughlin P, Hagemeister FB, RomagueraJE, et al. Fludarabine, mitoxantrone,and dexamethasone:an effective new regimen for indolent lymphoma[J].J Clin Oncol, 1996, 14(4): 1262--1268.
  • 2Velasquez WS, Lew D, Grogan TM, et al. Combination of fludarabine and mitoxantrone in untreated stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ low-grade lymphoma: S9501[J]. J Glin Oncol, 2003, 21(10): 1996-2003.
  • 3Alyea EP, Kim HT, Ho V, et al. Comparative outcome of non-- myeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age[J]. Blood. 2005, 105(4): 1810-1814.
  • 4Kim DH, Sohn SK, Baek JH, et al. Retrospective multicenter study of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation followed by reduced--intensity conditioning or conventional myeloablative regimen[]]. Acta Haematol, 2005, 113(4): 220-227.
  • 5Mielcarek M, Martin PJ, Leisenring W, et al. Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Blood, 2003, 102(2): 756--762.
  • 6de Lima M, Anagnostopoulos A, Munsell M, et al. Nonablative versus reduced--intensity conditioning regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and high--risk myelodysplastic syndrome: dose is relevant for long-term disease control after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Blood, 2004, 104 (3): 865-872.
  • 7Martino R, Iacobelli S, Brand R, et al. Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high---dose conditioning for aUogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. Blood, 2006, 108(3): 836--846.
  • 8Valcarcel D, Martino R, Sureda A, et al. Conventional versus reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignandes[J]. EurJ Haematol, 2005, 74(2): 144-151.
  • 9Kojima R, Kami M, Kanda Y, et al. Comparison between reduced intensity and conventional myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies aged between 50 and 59 years[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2005, 36 (8) : 667--674.
  • 10Komguth DG, Mahajan A, Woo S, et al. Hudarabine allows dose reduction for total body irradiation in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J], Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 68 (4) :1140-1144.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部