期刊文献+

咪达唑仑对大鼠海马CA1区突触传递的影响 被引量:1

Effect of midazolam on synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal CA1 area
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨咪达唑仑对大鼠海马CA1区突触传递的影响。方法成年雄性Wistar大鼠35只,体重190~220g,随机分为7组(n=5),单刺激下4组:对照组(C1组)、荷包牡丹碱组(B1组)、咪达唑仑组(M1组)和荷包牡丹碱+咪达唑仑组(BM组);配对刺激下3组:对照组(C2组)、荷包牡丹碱组(B2组)和咪达唑仑组(M2组)。单刺激条件:刺激方波波宽0.1ms、频率0.033Hz,配对刺激条件:刺激方波波宽0.1ms、频率0.033Hz,两个配对刺激间隔30ms,刺激强度为诱发兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)峰值刺激强度的50%。C1,2组和M1,2组记录EPSP幅值的基础值,随后分别腹腔注射生理盐水3ml/kg和咪达唑仑3mg/kg;B1,2组和BM组记录EPSP幅值的基础值,随后腹腔注射荷包牡丹碱2mg/kg,20min后BM组腹腔注射咪达唑仑3mg/kg。各组给药结束后再记录60min,每10min为一时段。单刺激下计算各时间段EPSP幅值与基础值的比值即相对幅值,配对刺激下记录两个配对刺激下的EPSP幅值(分别为E1和E2),计算E2/E1。结果与C1组比较,M1组EPSP相对幅值降低(P〈0.05或0.01),B1组和BM组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与C2组比较,B2组E2及e2/E1升高(P〈0.05),E1差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),M2组E1、E2及E2/E1均降低(P〈0.05);与B2组比较,M2组E1、E2及E2/E1均降低(P〈0.05)。结论眯达唑仑可抑制大鼠海马CA1区兴奋性突触传递,呈可逆性,其机制可能与增强γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能性突触前抑制性回路的兴奋性有关,而非直接影响GABA∧受体功能状态。 Objective To investigate the effect of midazolam on synaptic transmission in stratum radiatum of CA1 area of rat hippocampus and the underlying mechanism. Methods Thirty-five adult male Wistar rats weighing 190-220 g were randomly divided into 7 groups ( n = 5 each). Two types of stimulation were used: single stimulation and paired pulse stimulation. Four groups under single stimulation: control group (group C1 ), bieuculline group (group B1 ), midazolam group (group M1 ) and bicueulline + midazolam group (group BM). Three groups under paired pulse stimulation: control group (group C2 ), bieuculline group (group B2 ) and midazolam group ( group M2 ). The animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal (IP) pentobarbital 50 mg/kg. The stimulating and recording electrodes were inserted into the stratum radiatum of CA1 area of the hippocampus. The interval between the 2 pulse stimulation was 30 ms. Excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) was elicited before (baseline) and after IP bicuculline (2 mg/kg) or/and midazolam (3 mg/kg) administration. The EPSP amplitude was recorded during single stimulation. EPSP2/EPSP1 (E2/E1) ratio was recorded during paired pulse stimulation. Results Compared with group C1 , the EPSP amplitude was significantly decreased in group M1 ( P 〈 0.05 or 0.01), but no significant change was found in group Bt and BM (P 〉 0.05) . Compared with group C2 , E2 and E2/E1 ratio were significantly increased in group B2, while E2/E2 and E2/E1 ratio were significantly decreased in group M2 (P 〈 0.05). E1/E2 and E2/E1 ratio were significantly lower in group M2 than in group B2 (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Midazolam can reversibly depress the excitatory synaptic transmission efficacy in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus through presynaptic inhibitory circuit. CABA∧ receptor is not directly disturbed.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期981-984,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 咪达唑仑 突触传递 海马 Midazolam Synaptic transmission Hippocampus
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Kohno T, Wakai A, Ataka T, et al. Actions of midazolam on excitatory transmission in dorsal horn neurons of adult rat spinal cord. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104: 338-343.
  • 2Sato Y, Aoki M. Regional differences in the depressant effects of rnidazolam on excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett, 1997, 223: 181-184.
  • 3魏辉明,麻伟青,王慧明,杨云丽,董发团,李治贵.神经病理性痛大鼠海马突触长时程增强的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2008,28(10):895-897. 被引量:3
  • 4Berg-Johnsen J, Langmoen IA. Isoflurane effects in rat hippocampal cortex : a quantitative evaluation of different cellular sites of action. Acta Physiol Scand, 1986, 128: 613-618.
  • 5Wakasugi M, Hirota K, Roth SH, et al. The effects of general anesthetics on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro. Anesth Analg, 1999, 88: 676-650.
  • 6Kikuchi T, Wang Y, Sato K, et al. In vivo effects of propofol on acetylcholine release from the frontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum studied by intracerebral microdialysis in freely moving rats. Br J Anaesth, 1998, 80: 644-648.
  • 7Wislowska-Stanek A, Hamed A, Lehner M, et al. Effects of midazolam and buspirone on in vivo concentration of amino acids and monoamine metabolites in the rat hippocampus. Pharmacol Rep, 2008,60 : 209-218.
  • 8Gilbert ME, Mack CM. Field potential recordings in dentate gyrus of anesthetized rats: stability of baseline. Hippocampus, 1999, 9: 277- 287.
  • 9张镜如,主编.《生理学》.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.323.
  • 10Rodriguez Manzanares PA, Isoardi NA, Carrer HF, et al. Previous stress facilitates fear memory, attenuates GABAergic inhibition, and increases synaptic plasticity in the rat basolateral amygdala. J Neurosci, 2005, 25: 8725-8734.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Zimmermann M. Pathobiology of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol, 2001,429(1-3) : 23-37.
  • 2Wei F, Xu ZC, Qu Z, et al. Role of EGR1 in hippocampal synaptic enhancement induced by tetanic stimulation and amputation. J Cell Biol, 2000, 149:1325-1334.
  • 3Duric V, McCarson KE. Persistent pain produces stress-like alterations in hippocampal neurogenesis and gene expression. J Pain, 2006,7: 544- 555.
  • 4Kim SH, Chung JM. An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat. Pain, 1992, 50: 355-363.
  • 5Rodgers RJ. Effects of nicotine, mecamylamine, and hexamethonium on shock-induced fighting, pain reactivity, and locomotor behaviour in rats. Psychopharmacology(Berl), 1979, 66 : 93-98.
  • 6Wang M, Yang Y, Dong Z, et al. NR2B-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype glutamate receptors regulate the acute stress effect on hippocampal long-term potentiation/long-term depression in vivo. Neuroreport, 2006, 17:1343-1346
  • 7Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrela JM, et al. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods, 1994, 53:55-63.
  • 8Xiong W, Wei H, Xiang X, et al. The effect of acute stress on LTP and LTD induction in the hippocampal CA1 region of anesthetized rats at three different ages. Brain Res, 2004, 1005: 187-192.
  • 9Dong Z, Zhong W, Tian M, et al. Stress evoked by opiate withdrawal facilitates hippocampal LTP in vivo. Hippocampus, 2006, 16: 1017- 1025.
  • 10Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature, 1993, 361: 31-39.

共引文献2

同被引文献10

  • 1轩泓,李士通,庄心良,汪正平,王莹恬,苏依丹.异丙酚、咪达唑仑复合芬太尼对海马锥体神经元γ-氨基丁酸A受体的作用[J].上海医学,2005,28(11):916-918. 被引量:3
  • 2NG E,TADDIO A,OHLSSON A.Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012,6:CD002052.
  • 3COHEN M,SADHASIVAM S,VINKS A A.Pharmacogenetics in perioperative medicine[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2012,25(4):419-427.
  • 4STRAUB C J,LAU H M,PARLATO R,et al.Bidirectional regulation of intravenous general anesthetic actions by α3-containing γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors[J].Anesthesiology,2013,118(3):562-76.
  • 5KHALILOV I,ESCLAPEZ M,MEDINA I,et al.A novel in vitro preparation:the intact hippoeampal formation[J].Neuron,1997,19(4):743-749.
  • 6LEWIS S.Learning and memory:Hippocampus plays multiple choice[J].Nat Rev Neurosci,2012,13(9):600.
  • 7WELBERG L.Learning and memory:CA1 triggers the trace[J].Nat Rev Neurosci,2011,12(12):705.
  • 8BECKER K,EDER M,RANFT A,et al.Low dose isoflurane exerts opposing effects on neuronal network excitability in neocortex and hippocampus[J].PLoS One,2012,7(6):e39346.
  • 9ZHAO X,YANG Z,LIANG G,et al.Dual effects of isoflurane on proliferation,differentiation,and survival in human neuroprogenitor cells[J].Anesthesiology,2013,118(3):537-549.
  • 10唐俊,庄心良,李士通,徐国辉,陈猛.咪唑安定对大鼠海马锥体细胞延迟整流K^+通道的作用[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(5):287-289. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部