期刊文献+

胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的后路治疗疗效观察 被引量:2

Thoracolumbar burst fracture posterior curative effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎弓根螺钉系统内固定手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效。方法对39例胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者行透视下后路椎弓根螺钉系统内固定手术治疗或同时行椎管探查减压,植骨融合术。结果术后随访6-48个月,椎体平均高度由术前的前缘48%和后缘73%恢复到术后的前缘93%和后缘97%,Cobb′s角由术前平均25°恢复为术后平均55°。对脊髓损伤的患者按Frankel分级,术后平均提高1.2级。未发现椎弓根钉断裂,骨不愈合。结论椎弓根螺钉系统技术简单,操作方便,创伤较前路小,椎管减压效果仍理想,脊柱融合率较高,神经功能恢复满意,是一种较好的治疗胸腰爆裂骨折的方法。 Objective To explore the pedicle screws in system of fixed surgery thoracolumbar burst fracture curative effect. Methods Thirty-nine cases of thoraeolumbar burst fracture patients under the perspective of pedicle screws ,posterior fixation operation system treatment or spinal canal decompression, simultaneously detect and interbody fusion. Results The follow-up of 6 - 48 months, vertebral average height 48 leading by the preoperative and postoperative recovery after the edge to edge 73% 93% and edge horn's Cobb 97%, by an average of 25° for preoperative after 55° average. According to the spinal cord injury patients, and postoperative average increase Frankel classification of 1.2. Did not find pedicle nail, bone fracture nonunion. Conclusion The pediele screw placement system technology is simple, easy to operate, trauma is small, the road before, still ideal effect of spinal canal decompession of spinal fusion rate is higher, neural function recovered satisfactorily, is a better treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2009年第12期1908-1910,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 胸腰椎爆裂性骨折 椎弓根螺钉系统 椎管减压 thoracolumbar burst fracture pedicle screws spinal canal decompression
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献24

共引文献598

同被引文献13

  • 1杨益宇,张长松,王萧枫,林初勇.合并椎管内骨块的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的后路处理[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(12):796-798. 被引量:12
  • 2戴力扬,王向阳.胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的治疗[J].颈腰痛杂志,2006,27(1):3-7. 被引量:19
  • 3Shen W J, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine ,2001,26 : 1038-1045.
  • 4Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls D, et al. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperafivc treatment. Clin Orthop, 1984,189:142-149.
  • 5Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, et al. A new classification of thoraco- lumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and ueurologic status [ J ]. Spine, 2005,30(20) : 2325 -2333.
  • 6Whang PG, Vaccaro AR. Thoracolumbar fracture: posterior instru- mentation using distraction and ligamentotaxis reduction[ J]. Am Acad Orthop Surg,2007,15 ( 11 ) : 695 - 701.
  • 7Verlaau JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, et al. Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine : A systematic re- view of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome[ J ]. Spine,2004, 29(7) :803 - 814.
  • 8MeCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classifica- tion of spine fractures[J]. Spine, 1994,19(15) : 1741 - 1744.
  • 9刘冰,付蕊红,武长林,董红,黄鹤.AF钉内固定结合椎体成形术治疗新鲜胸腰椎骨折分析[J].河北医药,2008,30(9):1330-1331. 被引量:6
  • 10洪全明,兰林,叶刚,马骏,李嘉荣,翟延荣,沈飞.短节段椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰段脊柱爆裂性骨折分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2008,23(11):915-916. 被引量:22

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部