期刊文献+

美国刑法中的重罪谋杀罪规则评析 被引量:4

Review on the Felony Murder Rule in the U.S.Criminal LAW
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重罪谋杀罪是英美刑法中比较特殊,并引起很多批评和质疑的罪名。目前,美国大部分州的刑法仍保留有该罪名,但其适用范围和条件受到越来越多的限制,实际上被限于在实施重罪过程中故意或过失造成死亡结果的情形。由于该罪名的设置仍具有一些积极意义且限制了适用范围,尽管存在比较严厉的批评之声,但绝大多数州的刑法仍然保留了重罪谋杀罪规则,短期内没有被废除的迹象。 The felony murder rule is a quite controversial principle in criminal law both in Britain and American. It is still enforced in America, while in Britain, the birth place of this principle, has abolished it. Now, there are more and more restrictions on the felony murder rule in many States in the U. S. The restrictions on application leads to felony murder rule only applying to cases which the offender has knowingly or recklessly caused the death. Due to some positive meanings and the restriction on application scope, the felony murder rule still exists in most of the states despite of the harsh criticism from some scholars, and in the foreseeable fu- ture, it will still be in effect.
作者 高长见
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2009年第6期38-43,共6页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 重罪 重罪谋杀罪 美国刑法 因果关系 felony felony murder American criminal law causality
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1美国模范刑法典及其评注[M].刘仁文,王祎译.北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 2Steven. L. Emanuel. Criminal law [ M ]. CITIC PUBLISHING HOUSE. 2003:230 -235.
  • 3Binder Guyora, The origins of American felony mur- der rules [J]. Stanford Law Review, 2004(10) :267.
  • 4Fletcher: Rethinking Criminal Law [ M]. Oxford University Press ,2000:254.
  • 5蔡蕙芳.英美法上重罪谋杀罪规则的介绍与评析[G]//刑事法学之理想与探索(第二卷)《刑法各论》--甘添贵教授六秩祝寿论文集.台北:学林出版社,2002:61.
  • 6John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder. CRIMINAL LAW: Cases and Materials [ M ]. CITIC PUBLISHING HOUSE, 2003:468.
  • 7Wayne LaFave, Criminal Law[ M]. West Publishing 3d ED. , 2000:672.
  • 8Schulhofer, harm and Punishment: A Critique on the results of conduct in Criminal Law[J]. U. PA. L. REV. 1974 : 1497.
  • 9Wayne LaFave: Criminal Law, West Publishing, Hornbook Series, 3d ED, 2000, p690. Felony Murder: a tort law reconceptualization, 99 Harv. L Rev. p1918, 1986.
  • 10People v. Stamp 2 Cal. App. 3d 203,82 Cal. Rptr. 598 (1969).

共引文献17

同被引文献46

  • 1张明楷.结果与量刑——结果责任、双重评价、间接处罚之禁止[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,19(6):18-28. 被引量:58
  • 2张明楷.严格限制结果加重犯的范围与刑罚[J].法学研究,2005,27(1):82-96. 被引量:105
  • 3张明楷.刑法格言的展开[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..
  • 4托马斯·内格尔.人的问题[M].万以译.上海:上海译文出版社,2000.
  • 5张明楷.刑法学(第三版)[M].北京:法律出版社.2007:352.
  • 6柏拉图.法律篇[M].张智仁,何勤华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
  • 7Zimmerman M J. Luck and Moral Responsibility [J]. Ethics, 1987,97(2) :376.
  • 8Zimmerman M J. Taking Luck Seriously[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 2002,99(11) :562.
  • 9Kessler K D. The Role of Luck in the Criminal Law[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1994, 142 (6) :2188.
  • 10Bennett J. The Act Itself [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 : 60.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部