期刊文献+

前路减压加Cage椎间融合器植入治疗脊髓型颈椎病36例临床观察

Report of treatment in 36 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy operated by anterior approach and cage implanted
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨前路减压加Cage椎间融合器植入治疗脊髓型颈椎病的方法和疗效。方法:脊髓型颈椎病患者36例,病变累及1个节段者32例,累及2个节段者4例。全部前路减压加Cage椎间融合器植入治疗。结果:术前JOA评分、术前颈椎高度分别为6.7±0.5、35.4±5.32,术后3月15.7±1.3,38.7±5.82,二者相比P<0.01,差异有显著性,具有统计学意义;术后1年随访同术后差异无显著性;36例病人全部融合,椎间融合良好,无移位及假关节形成。结论:前路减压加Cage椎间融合器植入是治疗脊髓型颈椎病安全有效的方法,临床效果肯定。 Objective:To observe the method and effect of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cage implanted by anterior approach. Methods:36 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy,which affected positions located at 1 and 2 cervical vertebraes were 32 and 4 cases respectively,were treated by anterior decompression and cage implanted. Results:all the cases were followed up,the average time of follow-up was 1 year. The grafted bone became coalesce within 3 months after operation. The function of spinal cord was graded(6.7±0.5) before operation and(15.7±1.3) after operative according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) criteria. The height of cervical vertebra was(35.4±5.32) before operation,and it was(38.74±5.82) at postoperative 3 months,the comparison between preoperative and postoperative states was different(P〈0.01) . Conclusions:It is an effective method of canalis spinalis decompressing by anterior approach and reconciling of bone-grafting for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2009年第21期4102-4103,共2页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 前路 椎间融合器 脊髓型颈椎病 anterior approach interbody fusion cage Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1JosephaE. The surgical management of cerxical spinalstenosis, spondylosis, and myeloradicul opathy by means of theposterior aprroaeh[J]. Spine, 1988,13:864-868.
  • 2Chibbaro S, Benvenuti L, Carnesecchi S, et al. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2006,13(2):233-238.
  • 3Magte G. Cervical cage fusion with 5 different implant: 250cases [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2002,144:539-550.
  • 4Singh K,Vaccaro AR, Kim J, et al. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study [J]. Spine, 2004,29(8):845-849.
  • 5Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Lshii K, et al. Long term results of expansive open door larninop lasty for cervical myelopathy average 14-year follow-up study[J]. 2006,31 (26):2998-3005.
  • 6Akettler F, Wilke HL, Claes L, et al. Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cetvical interbody fusion:an invitro study[J]. J Neuro surg, 2001,94:97-107.
  • 7Kaiser MG. Multilevel cervical spondylosis[J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2006,17(3):263 -275.
  • 8Fraser JF, Hartl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: A meta-analysis of fusion rates [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007,6: 298-303.
  • 9Rapoff AI, Conrad BP, Johnson WM, et al. Load sharing in loremier and zephir anterior cervical plates[J]. Spine, 2003,28:2648-2651.
  • 10Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, et al. Changes in segmental intervertebralmofion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis:a prospeetive study[J]. Spine, 2004,29(2):E221-E226.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部