期刊文献+

不同模糊程度下模糊决策的决策偏好 被引量:11

The Decision-making Preference under Different Ambiguity Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究采用艾尔斯伯格悖论的变式,选取二择一的迫选任务,旨在探讨不同球数和不同模糊程度下模糊决策的决策偏好。结果发现,球数的不同对决策的偏好基本上没有影响;而模糊程度的不同,对决策的偏好有影响。具体表现为:模糊程度较高时,被试倾向于模糊厌恶,模糊程度较低时倾向于模糊寻求。 The decision preference under different ambiguity conditions was researched using the modification of Ellsberg paradox with a choice between two alternatives.The results suggested that the number of the balls in the bottle had no difference to the decision preference.But there was a significant difference to the decision preference under different ambiguity conditions.When the degree of the ambiguity was higher,the participants demonstrated ambiguity aversion.When the degree of the ambiguity was lower,the participants demonstrated risk seeking.
作者 张凤华
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2009年第6期51-55,共5页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 模糊决策 模糊厌恶 二择一的选择任务 变异性 扩散模型 ambiguity decision ambiguity aversion a choice between two alternatives variability the diffusion model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Fox C R, Weber M. Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance and decision context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002,88:476 - 498.
  • 2Platt M L, Huettel S A. Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 2008, 11 : 398 - 403.
  • 3Rustiehini A. Emotion and reason in making decisions. Science, 2005,310:1624 - 1625.
  • 4Rode C, Cosmides L, Hell W, et al.. When and why do people avoid unknow probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal forging theory. Cognition, 1999,72:269 - 304.
  • 5Stephens D W, Krebs J R. Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.
  • 6Pulford B D, lman A M. Size doesn't really matter: Ambiguity aversion in EUsberg urns with few balls. Experimental Psychology,2008,55:31 - 37.
  • 7Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971,6:649 - 744.
  • 8Einhom H J, Hogarth R M. Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review, 1985,92: 433 - 461.
  • 9Ghimrdato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M. Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econ. Theory, 2004, 118:133 - 173.
  • 10I)enes - Raj V, Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994,66: 819- 829.

同被引文献123

引证文献11

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部