期刊文献+

高校领导团队行为整合研究:团队认知视角 被引量:3

The Behavioral Integration of College Leadship Team:A Team cognition Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校作为"人类社会的动力站",在文明不断发展的历程中担当了不可替代的角色,始终与国家的兴盛同步前行。而高校的兴盛,离不开把握正确方向、准确定位、科学决策、团结合作的领导团队。本文从上层梯队理论说明为什么研究高校领导团队,高校领导团队作为研究对象的特点,其行为整合的重要性,以及从团队认知视角(团队认同)解释高校领导团队行为整合等层面解读高校领导团队。 During the process of continuously developmental civilization, as a power station of human society, colleges play an irreplaceable role, and have always been synchronous with country prosperous. However, colleges will not thrive without the right direction, accurate positioning scientific decision - making and collaboration of their leadership teams. The present paper first explains why research collge leadership team from the upper echelons theory, and then summarizes the features of college leadership team, analyzes the importance of behavioral integration in leadership team. At last, we fully discuss behavioral integration of eollge leadership team from the team cognition perspective.
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期190-193,共4页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 高校领导团队 行为整合 集体效能 团队认同 collge leadship team behavioral integration team cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1代芳芳 吴娴.试析高校领导团队建设.青年科学,2009,(3).
  • 2朱为鸿.我国高校领导团队的制度设计与有效运行[J].理工高教研究,2009,28(1):45-47. 被引量:3
  • 3Hambrick D C. Top Management Groups: A Conceptual Integration and Reconsideration of the" Team" Label [ J ]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1994, 16 ( 6 ) : 171 - 214.
  • 4Simsek Z, Veiga J F, Lubatkin M H & Dino R N. Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48 ( 1 ) : 69 - 84.
  • 5Hambrick D C. Corporate Coherence and the Top Management Team [ A ]. In Hambrick D C, et al. (Eds.), Navigating Change: How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation [ M ]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1998.
  • 6Mooney A C & Sonnenfeld J Management Team Conflict : Integration [ C ]. Academy 2001. Exploring Antecedents to Top The Importance of Behavioral of Management Proceedings,.
  • 7Tajfel H & Turner J C. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict [A]. In Worchel S. & Austin W. (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations [ M ]. Chicago: Nelson - Hall. 1986.
  • 8Fiske S T & Taylor S E. Social Cognition [ M ]. New York : McGraw - Hill, 1991.
  • 9Cameron, J E. A three -factor model of social identity[ J]. Psychology Press, 2004, 3:239 -262.
  • 10Foreman P & Whetten D A. Member' s Identification with Multiple - identity Organizations [ J ]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(6): 618-635.

共引文献3

同被引文献12

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部