期刊文献+

Coflex固定治疗L_(4~5)椎管狭窄及不稳的近期临床疗效分析 被引量:11

Function evaluation after interspinous implantation with Coflex after surgical decompression in degenerative lumbar stenosis with segmental instability with one year following-up
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腰椎棘突间Coflex固定治疗L4~5单节段腰椎管狭窄症伴轻度不稳的疗效。方法该院于2007年3月至2008年2月采用Coflex固定收治了18例L4~5腰椎管狭窄症伴轻度不稳患者,行椎管减压或加髓核摘除术后行Coflex固定。术后3、12个月随访时行腰椎正侧位、屈伸动力位X线检查,测量L4~5及L3~4节段活动度、L4~5椎间隙后缘高度,选用JOA和VAS评分评价手术效果。结果手术时间(72±14.6)min;出血量(56±25.4)mL;VAS评分和JOA评分术前与术后VAS、JOA评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前、术后3、12个月随访L4~5节段活动度(ROM)、L4~5椎间隙后缘高度(PDH)显示术前与术后差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。L3~4活动度各时间段差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论Coflex固定治疗L4~5椎管狭窄症伴轻度不稳,短期疗效良好,在稳定病变节段同时能减轻相邻运动节段应力防止其继发退变。 Objective To report the outcome,radiologic findings in the patients having spinal stenosis with mild segmental instability and undergoing surgical radieular decompression and implantation of Coflex in . Methods Eighteen adult patients having degenerative spinal stenosis with mild segmenlal instability and underwent implantation of Coflex (Spine motion, Germany) after lumbar mierosurgical decompression at L4-5 level were consecutively selected and studied for one-year clinical outcome. The clinical evaluation included visual analogue scale (leg and hack),JOA scale,and radiologic assessment preoperative and postoperative at 3 and 12 months. Results Average operation time was (72±14. 6)min,blood Lose during operation was (56±25.4)Ml,.In 3 and 12 months after surgery, the visual analogue scale score (VAS) and JOA score for both lower extremity pain and low back pain showed a significant improvement. The postoperative range of movement fROM) at L4-5 level decreased significantly compared with the preoperative ROM. The posterior disc height (PDH) of L4-5 showed a significant change. The R()M at the upper adjacent segments (L2-4) was not changed apparently during the follow up. Conclusion The placement of the interspinous Coflex shows an excellent and good clinical outcome in the patients having spinal stenosis with mild segmental instability in L4-5 and this method does not significantly affect degeneration at the adjacent segments.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期76-77,108,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 椎管狭窄 腰椎不稳.非融合固定 lumbar stenosis spinal instability nonfusion fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Hayashi T, Arizono T, Fujimoto T, et al. Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation a minimum 4-year follow-up [ J]. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi,2008,99(5) : 107.
  • 2Kumar MN,Jacquot F, Hall H. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease[J]. Eur Spine J,2001 ;10(4):309.
  • 3Schaeren S,Broger l,Jeanneret B. Minimum four year follow up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolis thesis trealed with decompression and dynamic stabilization[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2008,33(18) :E636.
  • 4Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. lnterspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3) : 255.
  • 5Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, et al. Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis:a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short term results [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2004,29(7) : 735.
  • 6Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA,et al. A prospective randomized multicenter study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year resuhs[J]. Eur Spine J, 2004, 13(1) :22.
  • 7Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbm neurogenic intermittent claudication [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2005,30(7) :744.
  • 8Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure[J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17 (8) :1049.
  • 9Kettler A, Drumm J, Heuer F, et al. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanieal in vitro study resulting Jn a new idea[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008,23 (2): 242.
  • 10Tsai K J, Murakami H, Lowery GL, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of aninterspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine[J]. J Surg Orlhop Adv, 2006, 15 (3) :167.

同被引文献185

  • 1张威,范顺武.腰椎滑脱融合术并发症研究进展[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(6):350-352. 被引量:1
  • 2邱贵兴.正确评价脊柱退变性疾病的非融合治疗技术[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(16):1081-1083. 被引量:11
  • 3杨惠林 唐天驷.腰椎不稳与腰椎管狭窄专题研讨会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(1):65-65.
  • 4Frankel VH,Nordin M著.临床骨科生物力学基础[M].∥过邦辅,编译.上海:上海远东出版社,1993:291.
  • 5Turner JA,Ersek M,Herron L,et al.Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions[J].JAMA,1992,268(7):907-911.
  • 6Kong DS,Kim ES,Eoh W.One-year outcome evaluation after interspinons implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability[J].J Korean Med Sci,2007,22(2):330-335.
  • 7Farfan HP.Mechanical Disorders of the Low Back[M].Philadelphia:Lea and Febiger,1973.37-40.
  • 8Cinotti G,De Santis P,Nofroni I,et al.Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen:anatomic study on predisposing factors[J].Spine,2002,27(3):223-229.
  • 9Sandhu HS,Toth JM,Diwan AD,et al.Histologic evaluation of the efficacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion[J].Spine,2002,27(6):567-575.
  • 10Christie SD,Song JK,Fessler RG.Dynamic interspinous process technology[J].Spine,2005,30(16 Suppl):73-78.

引证文献11

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部