期刊文献+

中印经济政治发展及其体制模式比较研究——国内外研究文献综述

On Comparison of Chinese and Indian Economic and Political Development and Their System Models: Literature Review of Research at Home and Abroad
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国和印度是发展中经济体两大典型模式,发展过程中孕育着解决世界问题的新方案和新思路。对中印两国经济政治发展及其体制模式进行比较研究,总结其经验和教训具有很强的现实意义。中国和印度作为亚洲的两个大国,其未来的发展壮大,并不存在谁超过谁的问题,其共同发展必将对亚洲和世界做出更多更大的贡献。正确看待中印两国各自发展模式,从发展模式看,中国无法与自己的国情分开,而印度则无法与社会结构分开,尤其不能与种姓制度分开。中国应该在中印全面比较研究的基础上,更关注中印两国如何能增强互补,共同发展,而避免用零和博弈的原则来解释中印的崛起。 China and India are two typical models of developing economy, embodying new program and thought solving world problems in development. It has practical significance to compare the two countries' economic and political development and their system models, and to conclude their experience and lessons. As two larger countries in Asia, their mutual development and prosperity wi].l definitely contribute a lot for Asia and the world, not compete with one another. Hence, the two countries should recognize their own developing models correctly. From developing models, China should rely on its own situation; while India should consider its social structure either, especially its caste system. Based on comprehensive comparison between China and India, China should concern cooperation and mutu- al development and avoid controlling their rapid development with zero-sum game.
作者 赵鸿
出处 《商业经济》 2010年第2期1-3,11,共4页 Business & Economy
关键词 中印比较 国内外研 文献综述 comparison between China and India, research at home and abroad, literature review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Arvind Panagariya.India in the 1980s and 1990s:Atriumph of sector matter[]..2003
  • 2Meghnad Desai."India and china:An essay in compara-tive political economy"[].the IMF Confer-enceon India and China.2003
  • 3UNCTAD.China and India-what explains their different FDI performance?[].World Investment Report.2003
  • 4VN Balasubramanyam,Vidya Mahambare.Foreign direct investment in India[].Lancaster University Management School Working Paper No.2003

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部