摘要
立法应把网络证据(电子证据)规定为一类新的证据,与原有的七种证据并列,从而解决网络证据的"合法身份"问题;非法秘密录制方式获得的网络证据不具备可采性,通过非法搜查、扣押等方式获得的网络证据,情节严重的一般不予采纳;法院在认定网络证据的真实性时,在证据契约方式、自认方式场合主要是审查这些方式的合法有效性,在鉴定方式的场合主要是审查鉴定的内容。
Legislation should provide the network evidence (electronic evidence) as a new class of evidence, side by side with the original seven kinds of evidence. In this way, we could solve the network's "legal status" issues. Secretly recording the illegal way to obtain the network evidence does not have the admissibility. Through the ways accessing to the network evidence, such as illegal search and seizure, the case that is serious can not be normally accepted. When the Court identifying the authenticity of the network evidence, it primarily censors the legal validity of these methods in evidence of contract and consider themselves way occasion, and censors the appraisal content in appraisal way occasion.
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第1期21-26,58,共7页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
重庆市教委人文社会科学研究项目:电子证据认证规则研究(08JWSK026)
关键词
网络证据
合法性
真实性
network evidence
validity
authenticity