不应追求“克隆转忆人”的论证是否成立?——答李锐锋、鲁琴的“商榷”

Do the arguments against the pursuit of "cloned memory-transferred human" stand? A reply to Li Yuifeng and Lu Qin

对我以"克隆转忆人"的方式实现人类永生之梦的构想,李锐锋与鲁琴撰文从多个方面进行了批驳,主要涉及如何理解永生、"我之为我"的关键、永生的价值、"克隆转忆人"的生产是否违背自然规律等问题。可经逐一辨析,发觉这些批驳还是与此前已有的各种质疑一样难以成立。

Liu Ruifeng and Lu Qin put forward a series of arguments, opposing my idea of realizing immortality by means of ＂cloned memory-transferred human＂. These arguments involve the understanding of immortality, the key components of ＂self＂, the value of immortality, and the ＂naturalness＂ of ＂cloned production of memory-transferred human＂. Yet, with careful analysis, it can be found that these arguments, like all the previous ones, do not stand.