论不真正不作为犯作为义务的法定性

Legality of feasance duty in pseudo crime of nonfeasance

在不真正不作为犯中,作为义务来源和作为义务没有被严格区分,导致作为义务来源理论的自相矛盾、作为义务的实质判断标准得不到发展。作为义务的法定不是指法律的规定,而是指刑法的规定。由于刑法无法对所有的作为义务进行规定,作为义务的法定性只能从法律的精神来理解,通过刑法解释来实现,故道德义务可以是作为义务的来源。

In the pseudo crime of nonfeasance, the source of feasance duty and the duty of feasance are not strictly distinguished leading to the self-contradiction in the theory of the source of feasance duty and little progress in practical criteria for feasance duty. The legality of feasance duty refers to the stipulations by criminal law. As criminal law cannot dictate all duties, the legality of feasance duty can only be obtained from the spirit of law and realized by means of the interpretation of criminal law. And moral duty can be the source of feasance duty.