摘要
目的探讨美皮康敷料治疗压疮的临床疗效。方法将43例压疮患者随机分为实验组(21例)和对照组(22例)。两组患者均给予常规清创治疗护理后,实验组疮面应用美皮康保湿敷料粘贴覆盖,定时更换;对照组采用常规碘伏消毒疮面,配合红外线照射,保持疮面干燥。分别观察两组压疮的愈合时间及治愈率。结果实验组的治愈率76.19%,明显优于对照组45.45%(P<0.05);实验组Ⅲ期压疮的治愈时间为(13.60±4.92)d,而对照组的治愈时间为(20.76±5.51)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论美皮康敷料治疗压疮较传统的碘伏加红外线照射的治疗方法更有效。
Objective To discuss the efficacy Mei Pi Kang surgical dressing on curing pressure sore.Methods Forty-three patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group(21 cases) and the control group(22 cases).After two groups of patients were given the conventional treatment and nursing, the experimental group was treated by Mei Pi Kang surgical dressing to cover the sore .The control group used the conventional iodine todisinfect the sore surface, with infrared radiation, maintaining the injured area dry.The pressure sore's cure time and the cure rate of the twogroups were observed separately.Results The cure rate of the experimental group was 76.19%, which obviously surpassed the control group compares 45.45%(P〈0.05).The cure time of the experimental group was(13.60±4.92) d, of the control group was(20.76± 5.51) d, with significant difference(P〈0.01).Conclusion Compared to the traditional iodine in combination with the infrared radiation, mei Pi Kang surgical dressing was more effective on curing pressuresore.
出处
《中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)》
CAS
2009年第4期29-31,共3页
Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition)
关键词
美皮康敷料
压疮
疗效
Mei Pi Kang surgical dressing
Pressure sore
Curative effect