期刊文献+

文学性的多元动态阐释 被引量:3

Towards a dynamic multianalysis of literariness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于学界对文学性的界定十分模糊,常常因为不能合理地处理文学性各相关因素的位置及其相互关系而造成争议,为进一步奠定文学研究及文学翻译研究的基础,运用归纳与演绎的论证方法总结了形式主义及解构主义的极端视角,并在此基础上借用法国学者热拉尔.热奈特的"构成论诗学"和"条件论诗学"两大概念,分析了文学性各相关因素的性质及其在文学研究中的作用。分析认为:文学性具有多元、动态、开放的特征;在文学性的多元构成中,各个单元均在各自的范围内发挥作用,彼此相互交叉、融合、渗透,任何一个单元都不可能解释整个复杂的文学现象。 Literariness is an important concept in literary studies, including the study of literary translation. Yet the interpretation of literariness has been contraversial because the factors of it have never been accepted in balanced ways. This paper aims at making clear of the basic factors of literariness and their different functions so as to lay a solid foundation for further literary studies. It first exposes the deficiencies of formalist and deconstructive literariness. Then, based on "constitutional poetics" and "conditional poetics" by Gerard Genette, this paper expounds that a more rational perspective on literariness should be dynamic, many-sided and open, in which all the factors function in their own ways and at the same time infiltrate among one another, and any isolated factor is surely too weak to work.
作者 吕敏宏
出处 《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第4期75-78,110,共5页 Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
基金 陕西师范大学重点科研项目(995120)
关键词 文学性 “构成论诗学” “条件论诗学” 泛话语特征 literariness "constitutional poetics" "conditional poetics" discourse feature
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1维克托·什克洛夫斯基,等.俄国形式主义文论选[M].方珊,等,译.北京:三联书店,1989.
  • 2雅各布森.俄苏形式主义文论选[M].蔡鸿滨,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989.
  • 3雅克·德里达.文学行动[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998..
  • 4Jonathan Culler. The literary of theory [ C ]//John Guillory, Kendall Thomas. What's left of theory. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  • 5余虹.文学的终结与文学性蔓延——兼谈后现代文学研究的任务[J].文艺研究,2002(6):15-24. 被引量:169
  • 6王岳川.“文学性”消解的后现代症候[J].浙江学刊,2004(3):11-19. 被引量:24
  • 7热拉尔·热奈特 史忠义译.热奈特论文集[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,2001..
  • 8乔纳森·卡勒.当代学术入门:文学理论[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.16.
  • 9彼得·威德森.现代西方文学观念简史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
  • 10李均.存在主义文论[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2001.

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1][13]Jonathan Culler,"The Literary of Theory" ,in What's Left of Theory, ed. Judith Butler,John Guillory & Kendall Thomas, New York & London: Routledge, 2000, p.289, p. 290.
  • 2J F Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition :A Report on Knowledge, Trans by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi,Foreword by Fredric Jamson, Manchester University Press, 1984.
  • 3Garvin Paull, A Prague School Reader on Aesthetics ,Literary Structure and Style ,Washington DC:Georgetown University Press, 1964.
  • 4Matejka Ladislav and Pomorska Krystyna, Readings in Russian Poetics,Formalist and Structuralist Views,Cambridge,Mass: M T T Press, 1971.
  • 5J F Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition :A Report on Knowledge, Trans. by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi,Foreword by Fredric Jamson, Manchester University Press, 1984, p 24.
  • 6Ihab Hassan,The Postmodern Turn zEssays in Postmodern Theory and Culture, The Ohio State University Press, 1987,p 171.
  • 7Charles Newman. The Post-Modern Aura, The Act of Fiction in an Age of Inflation . Northwestern Universityress, 1985,pp 87,87-88.
  • 8David Lodge, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature, London :Arnold, 1977, p 224.
  • 9Jean Baudrillard, The Ecstasy of Communication, New York, Semioteat, p 12.
  • 10辛普森 杨恒达译.《学术后现代》[A]..《问题》[C].中央编译出版社,2003年..

共引文献249

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部