期刊文献+

SPS对我国典型农产品的作用机理探析 被引量:7

On Mechanism of SPS on Chinese Agricultural Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卫生与植物卫生(SPS)措施已经成为影响我国农产品、食品贸易的最主要障碍。文章分析了SPS对水产品、蔬菜、禽肉和茶叶四种典型农产品的作用机理。研究表明,动植物疫病往往导致贸易禁止,是最为严重的SPS措施;生物性污染主要通过影响产品的上市数量,达到数量控制和价格控制的目的;化学品残留也是通过控制数量和成本作用于农产品;物理性污染通过影响产品的数量进而达到贸易限制的目的。我国应针对不同类别SPS措施的作用原理,做好预防和应对工作,以减少贸易的损失。 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures have become the main barrier to the trade of the Chinese agriculture product and food. This paper analyzed the mechanism of SPS on four agriculture products such as aquaculture, vegetable, poultry, and tea. It was found that animal diseases and plant pests are the most serious SPS measures and will lead to trade ban. Biological pollution by controlling the quantity restricts the trade quantity and price, the same with chemical pollution. Physical pollution aims to restrict the trade quantity. Therefore, China must try to prevent and deal with the pollution in relation to different types of SPS measures in order to reduce the trade loss.
作者 董银果
出处 《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第4期16-21,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70873082) 国家软科学基金项目(2007GX3D082) "中加小农户适应全球市场发展"项目与商务部 浙江大学CARD"985二期"课题"中国农产品出口应对SPS措施和反倾销:问题 挑战与对策"
关键词 SPS措施 农产品贸易 数量限制 价格限制 SPS Agriculture Product Quantity Control Price Control
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1国家质检总局.2006国外技术性贸易措施对我国对外贸易影响调查报告[R].2007.
  • 2Henson S. , R. Loader. " Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries : the role of sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. " [ J ]. World Development 29 ( 1 ) : 85 -102.
  • 3Kolstad I. , Wiig A.. A cost-benefit framework for allocating SPS-related technical assistance, www. cmi. no/public/ pub2002.
  • 4Henson S. , R. Loader. "Impact of sanitary and phytosanitary standards on developing countries and the role of the SPS Agreement" [ J ]. Agribusiness 15 ( 3 ) : 355 -369.
  • 5董银果.SPS措施影响贸易的模式——以中国农产品为例[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2008,15(3):20-26. 被引量:19
  • 6Chang H, Kinnucan H.. Advertising, information, and product quality: The case of butter[ J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73 (4) : 1195-1203,1991.

二级参考文献9

  • 1董银果.卫生和植物检疫措施影响农产品贸易的理论模型——以猪肉为例[J].国际贸易问题,2006(2):102-108. 被引量:13
  • 2Mattoo A. Discriminatory Consequence of Non-Discriminatory Standards[J]. Journal of Economic Integration, 2001, (3);368-380.
  • 3Roberts D, Orden D, Josling T. A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barrier in Agrieultural Marketl[R]. Market and Trade Economics Division, U. S Department of Agriculture. 1999.
  • 4Henson Spencer. Measuring the Economic Impact of Technical Measures on Trade in Agricultural Commodities[R]. Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph,2002.
  • 5Ivar Kolstad, Arne Wiig. A Cost-benefit Framework for Allocating SPS-related Technical Assistance[EB/OL]. (2002- 08)[-2004-03-08]. www. cmi. no/public/pub2002.
  • 6中国网.中国菠菜出口日本风波追踪--“标准”还是“壁垒”[EB/0L].(2004-08-25)[2006-12-03].http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/huanjing/645868.htm.
  • 7新华社.中国茶叶出口遭遇两难之痛[EB/OL].http://www.wenzhouglasses.com/html/print/8347.htmlL.(2004-09-24)[2006-12-05].
  • 8敖然.禽流感对中国禽肉出口的影响.(2005-11-11)[2007-02-07].http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/989820.html.
  • 9浙江农业信息网.中国蜂蜜出口尚未阴转晴[EB/OL].(2006-01-25)[2007-02-07].http://www.zjagri.gov.en/html/main/analyseView/2006012533041.html.

共引文献18

同被引文献34

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部