期刊文献+

WTO的相互认可制度评析

A Review of the Mutual Recognition under the WTO
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际贸易是在具有可预见性和稳定性的法律环境中进行的,但是各国法律规则的歧异与冲突日益制约着国际贸易的进一步发展。在解决跨国法律冲突的诸多方法中,由于相互认可制度兼具法律内容和法律效力的双重协调功能,在消弭跨国法律冲突中发挥着独特的法律作用。在借鉴欧盟成功运作的经验基础上,WTO开始积极倡导成员方采取相互认可制度协调它们在货物和服务贸易领域的法律冲突。在制定统一规则的多边回合谈判陷入僵局的时代背景下,务实灵活的相互认可制度应成为WTO体系解决法律冲突的重要方法创新。 In the era of globalization, conflicts of law among countries have a negative impact on the economic development. In the four solutions to conflicts of law, mutual recognition is characteristic of simplicity and flexibility. Therefore, the WTO first encourages its members to use the efficient method to coordinate their legal differences and conflicts in the fields of goods and services. Especially, after the failure of Doha Round, muhilateralism is in a difficult position so that mutual recognition proves to be a new approach to push forward the trade facilitation and liberalization.
作者 吴永辉
机构地区 华侨大学法学院
出处 《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2009年第4期85-93,共9页 Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基金 福建省社会科学规划基金项目(2009B079)
关键词 法律冲突 相互认可 GATT GATS 相似性 conflict of law mutual recognition GATT GATS similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1John H Jackson. The World Trade System : Law and International Economic Relations [M]. The MIT Press, 1997: 109-111.
  • 2[美]罗伯特·吉尔平.全球政治经济学:解读国际经济秩序[M].杨宇光等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006:74.
  • 3Lorand Bartels. The Legality of the EC Mutual Recognition Clause under WTO Law [J]. Joural of International Economic Law, Vol. 8, 2005, No. 3, p. 692.
  • 4Gerard Hertic. Imperfect Mutual Recognition for EC Financial Services [J]. International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 14, 1994, p. 178.
  • 5朱永强,高正桥.WTO框架下贸易便利化问题探析[J].华东经济管理,2003,17(S1):37-40. 被引量:16
  • 6Mary E Footer. The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Taking Stock and Moving Forward [J]. Legal Issues of Economic Integration , 2002, p. 19.
  • 7Aaditya Mattoo. MFN and the GATS, World Trade Organization, 154, Rue de Lausanne, CH- 1211 Geneva, Switzerland, p. 10.
  • 8Mahmood Bagheri. Chizu Nakajima, Optimal Level of Financial Regulation under the GATS [J]. Joural of International Economic Law, 2002, No. 5. p. 521.
  • 9Joel P Trachtman. Trade in Financial Services under GATS, NAFTA and the EC : A Regulatory Jurisdiction Analysis [J].Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 1995, p. 2.
  • 10Patrick B Griffin. The Delaware Effect : Keeping the Tiger in Its Cage. The European Experience of Mutual Recognition in Financial Services, Columbia Journal of European Law. Fall, 2001. p. 7.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部