期刊文献+

民航运输产业竞争力的组合评价方法 被引量:6

Combination evaluation method of air transport industry competence
原文传递
导出
摘要 应用组合评价方法评价了民航运输产业竞争力,研究了民航运输产业竞争力的内涵与影响因素,建立了民航运输产业竞争力评价指标体系,运用组合赋权法确定了各层次指标权重,并对2004~2006年中国、美国、德国、新加坡、日本和韩国的民航运输产业竞争力进行了实证分析。研究结果表明:2006年各国民航运输产业竞争力强弱依次为美国、德国、新加坡、日本、韩国和中国,评价结果能够客观反映各国民航运输产业竞争力的总体水平,评价方法科学合理。 Air transport industry competence was evaluated by using combination evaluation method, and its denotation and influencing factors were analyzed. A competence evaluation index system of air transport industry was built, the weights of evaluation indices were determined by synthetical weight method, and air transport industry competences of China, USA, Germany, Singapore, Japan and Korea from 2004 to 2006 were studied. Analysis result indicates that the competence order is USA, Germany, Singapore, Japan, Korea and China from strong to weak in 2006. The evaluation result can reflect the general level of every county objectively, so the evaluation method is reasonable. 5 tabs, 3 figs, 15 refs.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期102-109,共8页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 国家软科学研究计划项目(2006GXQ3B205)
关键词 民航运输产业 产业竞争力 组合评价方法 指标体系 air transport industry industry competence combination evaluation method index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1GOOD D H, ROLLER L H, SICKLES R C. Airline efficiency differences between Europe and the US: implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 80(3) : 508-518.
  • 2MONTEIRO L, MACDONALD S. From effieiency to flexibility: the strategic use of information in the airline industry[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1996, 5(3): 169-188.
  • 3OUM T H, YU Chun yan, ZHANG An-ming. Global airline alliances: international regulatory issues[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2001, 7(1): 57-62.
  • 4SCHERAGA C A. Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and Tobit analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2004, 38(5): 383 404.
  • 5OUM T H, FU Xiao-wen, YU Chun-yan. New evidences on airline effieiency and yields: a comparative analysis of major North American air carriers and its implications[J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2) : 153-164.
  • 6沈滨,伍青生.提高中国航空公司竞争力的分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2003,24(4):33-37. 被引量:13
  • 7包随义.加快培育和提升我国航空运输企业的核心竞争力[J].中国民用航空,2005(11):23-26. 被引量:3
  • 8刘少成,郑兴无,颜明池.中国民航企业竞争力研究(一)[J].中国民用航空,2005(7):10-10. 被引量:8
  • 9WANG R T, HO C T, FENG C M, et al. A comparative analysis of the operational performance of Taiwan's major airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2004, 10(5) : 353-360.
  • 10PARK Y. An analysis for the competitive strength of Asian maior airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2003, 9(6): 353-360.

二级参考文献112

共引文献500

同被引文献58

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部