期刊文献+

基于CNS定位误差的侧向碰撞风险模型 被引量:19

Lateral collision risk model based on CNS position error
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了有效地确定航路安全间隔与评估碰撞风险,研究了基于通信、导航、监视(CNS)定位误差的侧向碰撞风险问题。运用多维随机变量协方差矩阵,给出了CNS性能环境下侧向定位误差分布函数,建立了给定间隔下基于CNS定位误差的侧向碰撞风险模型,并对侧向碰撞风险进行了评估计算。计算结果表明:某航路侧向碰撞风险为4.8×10-13,在安全目标水平5.0×10-9之内,因此,该航路在现有的CNS性能环境下满足安全目标水平要求。 In order to confirm the safe separation of routes and evaluate the collision risk effectively, the lateral collision risk based on CNS(communication, navigation and surveillance) position error was studied. The multi-dimensional random variable covariance matrix was applied to gain the distribution function of the lateral position error under CNS environment, then the lateral collision risk model under CNS position error was established, and an example was calculated. Analysis result shows that the lateral collision risk of studied route is 4.8 × 10^-13, which is in the safety target level of 5.0 × 10^-9 , so the route under existing CNS environment is safe. 2 figs, 12 refs.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期110-113,共4页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 国家863计划项目(2006AA12A113)
关键词 空中交通控制 安全目标水平 侧向碰撞风险 定位误差 间隔标准 air traffic control target level of safety lateral collision risk position error separation standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards Ⅰ [J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(1): 88-98.
  • 2REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards-Ⅱ[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(2):169-186.
  • 3REICH P G, Analysis of long range air traffic systems: separation standards-Ⅲ [J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(3): 331-347.
  • 4BAKKER G J, BLOM H A P. Air traffic collision risk modeling[C] // IEEE. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Decision and Control. San Antonio: IEEE, 1993: 1464 1469.
  • 5BROOKER P. Longitudinal collision risk for ATC track systems: a hazardous event model[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2006, 59(1) : 55-70.
  • 6BLOM H A P, BAKKER G J, BLANKER P J G, et al. Accident risk assessment for advanced ATM[C]// National Aerospace Laboratory. Proceedings of the 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar. Orlando: National Aerospace Laboratory, 1998: 3-26.
  • 7张兆宁,张晓燕,李冬宾.基于VOR导航的平行航路侧向碰撞率计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(3):21-24. 被引量:28
  • 8张兆宁,黎新华,王莉莉.基于飞行跟驰模型的纵向安全间隔计算方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2008,8(3):73-76. 被引量:21
  • 9ANDREWS A. Method for error budgeting of inertial navigation systems[J]. Journal of Guidance and Control, 1979, 2(5) :438-440.
  • 10JENKIN A B, GICK R A. Collision risk posed to the global positioning system by disposed upper stages[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2006, 43(6): 1412-1418.

二级参考文献18

  • 1侯志祥,吴义虎,刘振闻,李河清.高速公路汽车追尾模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(4):37-39. 被引量:10
  • 2王晓原,隽志才,贾洪飞,孟昭为.基于安全间距的车辆跟驰模型研究综述[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2004,24(6):51-54. 被引量:32
  • 3王永泉,陈花玲,毛文雄.基于跟驰理论的道路交通噪声预测模型研究[J].系统仿真学报,2004,16(11):2413-2416. 被引量:8
  • 4朱代武.低空空域飞行冲突避让算法[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(3):73-76. 被引量:20
  • 5Filkins L D,Little J W.Study of aircraft separation criteria[D].Michigan:University of Michigan,1964.
  • 6Reich P G.Analysis of long-range air traffic systems:separation standards Ⅰ[J].Journal of Navigation,1966,19(1):88-98.
  • 7Hsu D A.The evaluation of aircraft collision probabilities at intersecting air routes[J].Journal of Navigation,1981,34(1):78-102.
  • 8赵洪元.空中交通安全及几种新型可靠性估计理论[D].北京:北方交通大学,1997.
  • 9Anderson D,Lin X G.Collision risk model for a crossing track separation methodology[J].Journal of Navigation,1996,49(3):337-349.
  • 10Filkins L D, Little J W. Study of aircraft separation criteria[R]. Michigan: University of Michigan, 1964.

共引文献47

同被引文献162

引证文献19

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部