摘要
研究了朱子《韩文考异》的学术背景,比较朱子《考异》方崧卿《韩集举证》的异同。朱子的时代,韩文传本的大量产生、韩学热潮的出现,为《考异》提供最充分的准备。宋代校勘学勃兴,为朱子《考异》提供文献基础。朱子晚年呕心沥血所作《考异》正如早年《四书集注》一样,只不过是完全用朴学的研究,来体现朱子对于性道的追求。朱子庆元年间何以能够完成这部校勘史上的杰作,又实在与方崧卿的《韩集举正》有着非常密切的关系。
This thesis focuses on the background of Textual Research on the Collections of Han Yu by Chu His and the difference between Textual Research on the Collections of Han Yu by Chu His and The correction of Han Yu's Works by Fang Songqing. Lots of Hart Yu's works, the tide of study on Han Yu, as well as the booming of textual criticism in Song Dynasty provided a good preparation for the Textual Research on the Collections of Hart Yu. Chu His employed Bu Xue Methodology to pursue Xing Dao in his Textual Research on the Collections of Han Yu which has a close relation with The correction of Han Yu's Works by Fang Songqing.
出处
《上海第二工业大学学报》
2009年第4期322-327,共6页
Journal of Shanghai Polytechnic University
关键词
朱子
韩文考异
韩集举正
Chu His
Textual Research on the Collections of Han YU
The correction of Han Yu’s Works