期刊文献+

从日本劳动立法看我国集体谈判权的保障 被引量:9

To View the Right on Collective Bargaining of China in the Perspective of Labor Legislation of Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 集体谈判,对劳动关系的调节十分重要。尽管如此,很多国家并未把集体谈判权作为一项独立的权利加以保障。而且,即便确立了集体谈判制度,也并不意味着集体谈判权一定能够得到保障。我国现状即是如此。而日本劳动立法把集体谈判权的保障放在重要地位,对日本劳使关系的调节起到了不可低估的作用。检视日本劳动立法及其实践可以发现,建立行政救济制度,将拒绝谈判作为不当劳动行为加以规制;建立司法救济制度,将回应谈判、诚实开展谈判从法律上义务化,是保障集体谈判权的核心和关键所在。 Collective bargaining is very important to the adjustment of labor relations. However, the right on collective bargaining has not been protected as an independent right in many countries. And, even if the collective bargaining system has been established, it does not mean the right on collective bargaining will be protected. It is the case in China. Japanese labor legislation puts the right on collective bargaining in an important position and it has played a very important role of adjusting labor relations in Japan. To view the labor legislation and practices in Japan we can find that, the critical point of protecting the right on collective bargaining is to set up the administrative relief system so as to regulated the refusal to bargaining as unfair labor practice ; to set up the judicial relief system so as to make the respond to bargaining and honest negotiations as legal obligations.
作者 李立新
机构地区 上海大学法学院
出处 《中国劳动关系学院学报》 北大核心 2009年第6期78-82,共5页 Journal of China University of Labor Relations
关键词 劳动立法 集体谈判权 权利保障 labor legislation right on collective bargaining right protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[日]日本労働法学会編集.利益代表システムと団結権[M].有斐阁,2000.
  • 2[日]籾山常喜.団結権保障とその規範的意義丒內容[J].季刊労働法別冊4号.1979.
  • 3[日]判例時報社.団体交涉判例.判例時報,1989.
  • 4[日]片岡昇.労働法(1)第3版補訂[M].有斐阁.1998.
  • 5[日]小西國友,渡辺章,中嵨士元也.労働関係法[M].有斐阁.1992.
  • 6[日]小西國友.労働法[M].三省堂.2008.
  • 7[日]舎川昭三.平和義務の理論[J].労働法律旬報853号,1974.
  • 8[日]西谷敏.平和義務違反の争議行為と損害賠償丒差止仮処分[J].労働法律旬報853号.1974.
  • 9[日]日本労働研究機構.WTO加盟に備ぇ、ストラィキ労働組合法大幅改定、権默認の考ぇ方も[J].海外労働時報(中国).2001.

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部