论况周颐对明词的重新评价——兼及况氏之词心史观

On KUANG Zhou-yi's(况周颐) Re-evaluation of Ci in the Ming Dynasty

"词亡于明"、"明代无词",是清代词学一个不证自明的价值判断,况周颐则在词史观、词学价值观、词学批评等方面对其予以反拨,以为词史上的词格纤靡之变,罪不在于明而在清;明词体性与风格新变,乃是风会所趋,以陈铎和屈大均词作为代表的一代明词有其重大词学价值,体现出对明清词史的重新反思。况氏对明词的重新评价根基于其词学价值核心——词心,以"词心"观照词史,构成其词心史观。

＂Ci disappeared,in the Ming dynasty ＂,＂there was no Ci in the Ming Dynasty＂ , is an value judgment which is explicit and self-evident. KUANG Zhou-yi retorted this view from the history of Ci poetry,thoughts on the value of Ci study,and Ci study criticism. He thought that word style changed extravagantly in the history of Ci study. It was not the fault of the Ming dynasty, but that of the Qing dynasty; Ming Ci stylistic and style of the new change are a trend. A gen- eration- Ming Ci with the representative of CHEN Tuo and QU Da-jun has a significant Ci value reflection and reflects re- evaluation to the Ci history of the Ming and Qing dynasties. KUANG Zhou-yi made a new review to the Ci in the Ming dynasty, which was based on its core values of poet＇s mood. He made a new perspective with poet＇s mood to constitute the view of poet＇s mood history.