整体型治理的行动逻辑被引量：54

Action Logic of Holistic Governance

导出

摘要整体型治理是继新公共管理运动后在全球兴起的一场治理革命,它是在当前公共治理碎片化和风险社会来临的背景下为解决棘手难题而进行的公共治理结构的重建。整体性治理是从新涂尔干主义途径来寻求公共治理的协调和整合,并且运用现代信息技术来提升治理效率。当然,在寻求公共治理工具理性的同时,整体性治理通过恢复公民身份和发挥公民社会的作用来获得价值理性。 Following the new public management, holistic governance is a kind of revolution in public governance to tackle the problems of government fragmentation and risk society. It seeks for the coordination and integration of public governance in a Neo - Durkheimian approach and promotes the efficiency by modem information technology. Of course, while searching for the instrumental rationality, holistic governance achieves its value rationality through restoring citizenship and playing the role of civil society.

作者曾令发

机构地区华南师范大学公共管理学院

出处《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期110-114,共5页 Chinese Public Administration

基金国家社会科学基金青年项目"公共事业民营问题研究"(项目编号:07CZZ014)研究成果之一

关键词整体型治理工具理性价值理性 holistic governance, instrumental rationality, value rationality

分类号 D035.1 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量：253
2Perri 6, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer and Gerry Stoker. Towards Holistic Governance: the New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave, 2002. p34, pp37 - 39, p212, pp40-41, p29, p143.
3W. J. Horst.Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 1973, Vol. 4, ppl61 - 167.
4R. A. W. Rhodes. The Hollowing out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 1994,Vol. 65, p146.
5Perri 6, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer, and Gerry Stoker. Governing in the Round: Strategies for Holistic Government London: Demos, 1999. p25.
6Perri 6. Holistic Government. London: Demons, 1997. p32, p51.
7Perri 6. Joined - Up Government in the Western World in Comparative Perspective: A Preliminary Literature Review and Exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2004. Vol. 14, p108.
8Perri 6. Institutional Viability: a Neo - Durkheimian Theory. Innovation, 2003. Vol. 16, p408.
9孔繁斌.多中心治理诠释——基于承认政治的视角[J].南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）,2007,44(6):31-37. 被引量：77
10彭锦鹏.全观型治理:理论与制度化策略.政治科学论丛(台湾),2005,(23).

二级参考文献72

1华勒斯坦.《开放社会科学》[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997年版.第82页.
2查尔斯·泰勒.《承认的政治》[A]..《文化与公共性》[C].,.第290页．第291页．第297页．第298页.
3查尔斯·泰勒.《承认的政治》，《文化与公共性》第290-337页，汪晖,陈燕谷主编，三联书店1998年版.
4Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12.
5Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15.
6Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
7Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
8Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93.
9Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37.
10Hood, C. (2005). The idea of Joined - Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.) , Joined - Up Government. British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.