期刊文献+

树脂黏结剂黏结铸瓷基底微渗漏的研究 被引量:5

Microleakage of various cementing agents for casting ceramics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价2种树脂类黏结剂对IPS Empress2铸瓷基底微渗漏的影响。方法:选择无龋坏的人类前磨牙16颗,随机分为2组,每组8颗。常规制作V类瓷嵌体。第1组用RelyX Unicem进行黏结,第2组用Variolink2进行黏结。所有样本在37℃蒸馏水中储存24h,冷热循环500次后,对试件进行染色实验,在体视显微镜下记录染色情况,采用SPSS11.0软件包对结果进行统计学分析。结果:2种树脂黏结剂黏结IPS Empress2铸瓷基底的微渗漏现象在釉质界面均好于牙本质界面(P<0.05),但Variolink2黏结组和RelyX Unicem黏结组的微渗漏差异无统计学意义。结论:Variolink2和RelyX Unicem黏结IPS Empress 2铸瓷基底在牙本质和牙釉质界面具有不同的抗微渗漏性能,但2种黏结剂之间无统计学差异。 PURPOSE:To observe and compare the microleakage of different composite resin cement systems for IPS Empress 2 ceramics base.METHODS:Sixteen healthy non-carious human molars were selected in the study.Class Ⅴ ceramic inlay was prepared by IPS Empress 2 ceramics.The samples were divided into two groups,eight in each group.RelyX Unicem and Variolink 2 were used for bonding respectively in 2 groups.All specimens were stored in water at 37℃ for 24 hours,then the specimens were subjected to 500 thermocycles ranging from 5℃ to 55℃.Eight specimens in each group were evaluated by dye penetration.The microleakage was examined with light microscope.Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS11.0 software package.RESULTS:Enamel margins exhibited lower leakage than dentin margins by using two cementing agents for casting ceramics (P〈0.05).The depth of dye for Variolink 2 and RelyX Unicem at enamel and dentin was not significantly different (P〉0.05).CONCLUSIONS:The microleakage of Variolink 2 and RelyX Unicem for IPS Empress 2 ceramics base has similar sealing abilities.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2009年第6期620-623,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 上海市科学技术委员会资助项目(08DZ2271100) 上海市重点学科建设项目(S30206)~~
关键词 树脂黏结剂 铸瓷 微渗漏 Adhesive resin cement Cast ceramics Microleakage
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, et al. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement [J].Dent Mater,2007,23(2): 218-225.
  • 2De Munck J, Vargas M, Van L,anduyt K, Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(10):963-971.
  • 3翁维民,张修银,张富强.黏结时间对树脂黏结剂剪切强度的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2007,16(5):527-529. 被引量:6
  • 4Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, et al. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays[J]. Dent Mater, 2004,20(5):463-469.
  • 5Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various ceroenting agents for full cast crowns [J]. Dent Mater,2005,21(5): 445-453.
  • 6Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, et al. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays[J]. Dent Mater, 2001, 17(3):191-196.
  • 7Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.Adhesive luting of indi- rect restorations[J]. Am J Dent, 2000, 13(Spec No):60D-76D.
  • 8顾新华,M.Kern.树脂类粘结剂边缘厚度对全瓷冠边缘微渗漏的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2002,16(5):408-410. 被引量:3
  • 9Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Zuchner H, et al. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study[J]. Dent Mater, 2006,22(10):934-941.
  • 10Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 2007,23(1):71-80.

二级参考文献19

  • 1[1]Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental Luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):280.
  • 2[2]Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):135.
  • 3[3]White SN, Ingles S, Kipnis V. Influence of marginal opening on microleakage of cemented artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(3):257.
  • 4[4]Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982, 11(6): 439.
  • 5[5]Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994, 44(1): 19.
  • 6[6]Jokstad A,Mjor IA.Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent 1996,24(5): 309.
  • 7[7]Hahn P, Schaller HG, Mullner U, et al. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(8):567.
  • 8[8]Nicholson JW, McKenzie MA. The properties of polymerizable luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(10):767.
  • 9[9]Ferrari M,Mannocci F,Mason PN,et al.In vitro leakage of resin-bonded all-porcelain crowns. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(3):233.
  • 10[10]Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582.

共引文献7

同被引文献52

  • 1王宁,骆小平,俞长路,张洁,钱冬冬.高强度纤维桩树脂核的临床应用研究[J].口腔医学,2005,25(3):149-151. 被引量:129
  • 2陈凌,魏斌,汪义永,吴浩凌.自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统微渗漏情况的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(5):585-585. 被引量:5
  • 3郭一波,张建中.3种黏接剂的微渗漏比较[J].口腔医学,2007,27(6):290-292. 被引量:9
  • 4杜珍,汲平.纤维桩的分类及性能特点[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2007,8(3):227-228. 被引量:31
  • 5姜婷,二阶堂澈,等.实用口腔粘结修复技术.北京:人民军医出版社,2008,35-44.
  • 6Mclean JW,Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twenties centrery [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent,2001,85 ( l ) :61 - 66.
  • 7Larson TD. The clinical significance andmanagement ofmicroleakage Part two [ J ]. Northwest Dent,2005,84 ( 2 ) : 15 - 19.
  • 8Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal Adaptation andMicroleakage of Procera AllCeram Crnwnswith Four Cements [ J ]. lnt J Prosthodont,2004,17 ( 2 ) : 529 - 535.
  • 9Wong TC, Bryant RW. Glass ionomer cements: dispensing and strength[J]. Aust Dent J,1985,30(5) : 336 -340.
  • 10Catlani-lorcntem A, Dupuisv, Moya F, et al. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement[ J]. Den Material, 1999,15 (1):21-32.

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部