期刊文献+

低功率He:Ne激光促进种植体骨结合的实验研究

Animal Study on the Influence of Low-level Laser Irradiation on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨低功率He:Ne激光照射能否增加种植体骨结合率。方法:选取6只Beagle犬,于每只犬每侧胫骨植入3枚种植体,将每只犬的6颗种植体随机编入A、B、C组,A组设为对照组,B、C组术后立即采用低功率He:Ne激光照射,B组持续照射1周,C组持续照射2周。术后4、8、12周每次处死2只动物,取材制作非脱钙骨磨片,进行骨形态计量学分析,比较各组新骨形成状况,计算每颗种植体骨结合率并作统计学处理。结果:每个检测期A、B、C组种植体骨结合率均有显著差异(P<0.01),均表现为:C组(B组(A组。结论:低功率He:Ne激光照射能显著增加种植体骨结合率,连续照射2周较1周效果好。 Objective.. To investigate the influence of low--power laser irradiation on implant--osseointegration. Methods: 6 Beagle dogs were selected according to international standards. In accordance with the surgical implanting method of BLB implant system, surgeries were operated on each dog from both sides of the tibia preparation. Three implant sockets were implanted with BLB (φ3.3 × 8mm) implantS. A total of 36 implants with interval 2cm were randomly divided into A, B, C group. A group was not irradiated. B, C groups were the experimental groups. Immediately after the use of He-Ne laser (wavelength: 632.8nm, power: 35mW, frequency: 50Hz ± 1Hz, spot diameter of 1.2cm) irradiation, B group was continuously exposured for 1 week. C group was two weeks exposured. After 4,8,12 weeks, two each were killed. The grinding slices were prepaved. Results: At each detection of phase, the rates of implant osseointegration of A, B, C group were significantly different (P〈0.01), which expressed as: group C〉group B〉group A. Conclusion: The low-power He: Ne laser irradiation can significantly increase the rate of implant osseointegration. And two weeks continuous exposure was better than 1 week.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期733-735,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 广州市海珠区科技重点攻关项目(编号:2007-Y-005)
关键词 种植体 低功率激光 种植体-骨结合率 动物研究 骨形态计量学 Implant Low-power laser Implant-osseointegration rate Animal study Bone histomorphometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1King GN, Hermann JS, Sehoolfield JD, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible[J]. J Periodontol, 2002, 73(10) : 1111-1117.
  • 2Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface[J]. J Dent Res, 2003, 82(3) :232-237.
  • 3Zitzmann NU, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, et al. Soft tissue reactions to plaque formation at implant abutments with different surface topography. An experimental study in dogs[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2002, 29(5):456-461.
  • 4Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26(1):9-17.
  • 5Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs[J]. J Periodontol, 2008, 79 (2):260- 270.
  • 6Dibart S, butment bacterial seal: The locking taper syWarbington M, Su MF, et al. In vitro evaluation of the implant-astem[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(5):732-737.
  • 7Marco F, Milena F, Gianluca G, et al. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis[J]. Micron, 2005, 36(7/8):630-644.
  • 8Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing[J]. J Dent Educ, 2003, 67(8):932-949.
  • 9Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface[J]. Biomaterials, 1999, 20 (23/24) : 2311-2321.
  • 10Davies JE. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces[J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28 (34) : 5058-5067.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部