2Harvati K. Quantitative analysis of Neanderthal tempora bone morphology using three- dimensional geometric mor phometrics[J].Am J Phys Anthropol, 2003, 120(4):323- 338.
7Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class Ⅱ division Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children[J]. The Angle orthodontist, 1997, 67(2):111-120.
8Rothstein T, Yoon-Tarlie C. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class Ⅱ, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part 1: characteristics of size, form, and position [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(3) :320-332.
9Brezniak N, Arad A, Heller M, et al. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class Ⅱ Division 2 malocclusion[J].The Angle orthodontist, 2002, 72(3):251-257.
10Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion[J]. The Angle orthodontist, 2002, 72( 5):456-463.
4Hashimoto K,Arai Y,Iwai K,et al.A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2003,95(3):371-377.
5Winter A A,Pollack A S,Frommer H H,et al.Cone beam volumetric tomography vs.medical CT scanners[J].N Y State Dent J,2005,71(4):28-33.
6Erickson GE,Waite DE.Mandibular asymmetry[J].J Am Dent Assoc,1974,89(6):1369-1373.
