1Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2Ibarra, H. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 422-447.
3Mollica, K.A., Gray, B., Trevino, L.K. 2003. Racial homophily in new comers' social neworks in a culturally diverse setting[J]. Organization Science, 14(2): 123-136.
5Burt R S. Sm/ctural holes and good ideas(in press)[J]. American Jour- nal of Sociology2004,110(2).
6Butt R S. Structural holes." the social structure of eompetJ?ion[M].Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1992.
7Feeley T H,Barnett G A.Predictinb~ employ- ee turnover li'om communication netwoz'k,s[J].Hu- man Communication Research,1997,23(3): 370-387.
8Hellman, Steven Wendell. An evaluative study of the impact of new employee orientation on newcomer organizational commitmen[J].Dis- sertation Abstracts International. Section A: Hu- manities and Social Scienccs,2000,( 2 ):6 7 8.
9Kanouse, Daniel N.; Warihay, Pbilomena L'A new look at employee orientatior[J].Training and Development Jouznal, 1980,7(34):34-35.
10Mobley W. Intermediate Engages in the relationship bctween job satisfaction and employ- ee turnover[ J] .Joural of Applied Psychology, 1997, 62(2):237-241.
