支气管镜检查中两种吸入麻醉方法效果对比

Comparison of the efficiency of two techniques used in anaesthesia for bronchoscopy

【目的】探讨支气管镜检查术前两种不同吸入麻醉方法的效果。【方法】对我院2000年4月-2006年7月接受支气管镜检查的619例患者随机分为两组,雾化吸入麻醉组(A组)321例,喉头喷雾麻醉组(B组)298例,观察对比两组麻醉的效果。【结果】A组麻醉成功率98.7%,B组麻醉成功率97.7%,A组成功率优于B组。【结论】雾化吸入麻醉的效果明显优于喉头喷雾麻醉的效果,有推广应用价值。

[Objective] To compare the efficiency of two techniques used in anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. [ Methods] 619 patients who received bronchoscopy from APR 2000 to July 2006 in our hospital were randomly enrolled into two groups： group A （ n = 321）, in which the anaesthetic was delivered with nebulized aerosols; and group B （ n = 298） in which the anaesthetic was sprayed on laryngeal region. The efficiencies of the two techniques were compared. [Results] There were significant more patients who experience successful anesthesia in group A （98.7%） than those in Group B （97.7%）. [Conclusions] The anaesthesia for bronchoscopy administrated by inhalation of nebulized aerosols was more efficient than that by laryngeal spray.