期刊文献+

欧盟《知识产权执法指令》述评 被引量:8

A Brief Analysis of Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧盟《知识产权执法指令》是欧盟区域知识产权保护取得实质性飞跃的重要一步。欧盟制订《知识产权执法指令》既是打击假冒和盗版的需要,又是有效执行欧盟知识产权统一立法的需要。该指令的内容主要包括知识产权范围、诉讼主体、证据规则、信息权、临时措施、预防措施、损害赔偿等民事和行政程序及救济。与《TRIPS协定》执法条款相比较,欧盟《知识产权执法指令》既有相同之处,又有很多不同之处,特别是它的超TRIPS特征,反映了欧盟不断加大知识产权保护的发展趋势。这种发展趋势不仅对欧盟内部知识产权制度产生了重要影响,而且激起了发达国家成员与发展中国家成员有关知识产权执法的全球大辩论。 Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights(EU Enforcement Directive),containing mainly the scope of intellectual property rights,subjects of actions,rules of evidence,rights to information and civil and administrative procedures and reliefs like interim and precautionary measures and the compensation for damages,is a noteworthy step for the intellectual property protection in the EU single market.It is aimed at combating the counterfeit and pirate products,as well as at harmonizing the intellectual property legislation in the EU.It has both similarities and dissimilarities compared with the enforcement clauses in the TRIPS agreement,especially in that the TRIPS plus clauses reflect the tendency of the EU's strengthening of intellectual property protection,which not only bears great significance for the IP system within the EU,but also stimulates global debates on the enforcement of intellectual property rights between the developed and developing countries.
作者 余敏友 廖丽
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期84-99,共16页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目<WTO协议在我国实施中的重大法律问题>(01JAZJD820003)的阶段性成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1OJ L 157, 30.4. 2004, Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, as corrected and republished in OJ L 195, 2.6. 2004.
  • 2OJ L 157, 30.4. 2004, Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, as corrected and republished in OJ L 195, 2.6. 2004.Article 20 ( 1 ).
  • 3OJ L 157, 30.4. 2004, Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, as corrected and republished in OJ L 195, 2.6. 2004.Article 3 (2).
  • 42003年《欧洲议会和委员会有关知识产权执法措施和程序的立法建议》第20条.
  • 5《欧洲议会和欧盟理事会关于旨在确保执行知识产权的刑事措施指令(草案)》(T6-0145/2007).
  • 6COM(2005) 479 final,P.3.
  • 7ChristopheDeVroey,郑丹怡.欧盟关于知识产权执法的建议[J].电子知识产权,2004(1):35-37. 被引量:4
  • 8OJ L 196, 2.8. 2003.
  • 9COM(2003 ) 46 final.
  • 10COM(85) 310 final.

二级参考文献32

  • 1[英]弗兰西斯·斯奈德 宋英编译.《欧洲联盟法概论》[M].北京大学出版社,1996年6月第1版.第50页.
  • 2韩燕煦 载朱晓青 黄列主编.《论条约在中国国内的适用》[A].载朱晓青,黄列主编.《国际条约与国内法的关系》[C].世界知识出版社,2000年版.第211-215页.
  • 3See Case 9/73 Schluter v. Hauptzollamr Lorrach, (1973) ECR 1135.
  • 4Case 38/85 Nederlandse Spoorwegen v. Inspecteur der invoerrechten en accijnzen, (1975) ECR 1439.
  • 5Case 112/80 Durbeck v. Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main Flughafen, (1981) ECR 1095.
  • 6Case 261/81 Societa ltaliana per L' Oleodotto Transalpino(SIOT) v. Ministero delle Finanze dello Stato, (1983) ECR 731.
  • 7Case 0267 - 269/81 Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v. Societa Petrolifera Italiana SPA, (1983) ECR 801.
  • 8Case 290 - 291/81 Compagnia Singer SPA et Geigy. SPA v.Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stalo, (1983) ECR 847.
  • 9Miquel Montana i Morn, Equilibrium-A Rediscovered Basis for the ECJ to Refuse Direct Effect to the Uruguay Ronnd Agreements? Journal of World Trade.Vol. 3(1996), No. 5, p. 45.
  • 10王铁崖.《条约在中国法律制度中的地位》[J].中国国际法年刊(中国对外翻译出版公司),1996,(1994):3-18.

共引文献37

同被引文献84

  • 1龚向前.试析国际法上的“软法”——以世界卫生组织“软法”为例[J].社会科学家,2006,21(2):98-100. 被引量:26
  • 2Fritz Blumer, "Jurisdiction and Recognition in Transatlantic Patent Litigation",Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 9, 2001, pp. 329-401.
  • 3Christopher Wadlow, Enforcement of Intellectual Property in European and International Law: The New Private International Law of Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom and the European Community, Sweet & Maxwell, 1998, p. 18.
  • 4Eric Jooris, "Infringement of Foreign Copyright and the Jurisdiction of English Courts", European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1996, pp. 129-130.
  • 5Richard Arnold, "Can One Sue in England for Infringement of Foreign Intellectual Property Rights?", European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1990, pp. 254-263 .
  • 6Fritz Blumer,"Patent Law and International Private Law on both Sides of the Atlantic", WIPO Doc. No. WIPO/PIL/01/3, 1 2.1, January 17, 2001, pp. 11-12.
  • 7Judgment of Nov. 24, 1989, HR, 1992 NJ 404 (Neth.). Also see John R. Thomas, "Litigation beyond the Technological Frontier: Comparative Approaches to Multinational Patent Enforcement", Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1996, pp. 299-300.
  • 8District Court of The Hague of December 23, 1997. IER 1998.75, BIE 1999.55.
  • 9James Fawcett, "Special Rules of Private International Law for Special Cases: What Should We Do about Intellectual Property?", in James Fawcett ed. , Reform and Development of Private International Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North, Oxford, 2002, pp. 141-142.
  • 10Fritz Blumer,"Patent Law and International Private Law on both Sides of the Atlantic" ; Christopher Wadlow, Enforcement of Intellectual Property in European and International Law, para. 3-92.

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部