期刊文献+

不同种植方式春玉米田杂草的生态经济阈值研究 被引量:6

Eco-economic Threshold of Weeds in Spring Corn Field under Different Planting Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在不同种植方式下,通过对玉米田杂草不同密度对玉米产量构成因素的影响,及防治中生态经济阈值模型的初步研究,建立了杂草密度和玉米产量损失率之间的函数关系。研究结果表明,清种玉米田中杂草治理的生态经济阈值为7.41~8.00株/m2,间种苜蓿田中杂草治理的生态经济阈值为8.43~9.47株/m2。当田间杂草密度低于其生态经济阈值时,不需要防除。 Under different planting methods,function equations between density of weeds in spring corn field and corn yield components and their eco-economic threshold model were established.The results showed that the eco-economic threshold of spring maize weeds in the corn field was 7.41~8.00 plants per square meter,and was 8.43~9.47 plants per square meter in intercropping of corn and alfalfa.When the weed density was lower than the eco-economic thresholds in fields,no weed controlling measures might be taken.
出处 《作物杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期49-52,共4页 Crops
基金 辽宁省教育厅高等学校创新团队科研项目(2009T088)
关键词 种植方式 玉米田杂草 生态经济阈值 Planting methods Weed in corn field Eco-economic threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1吴万春,宁洁珍.农田杂草生态学与农业生产的关系[J].生态科学,1994,13(1):155-156. 被引量:2
  • 2D A Ball, S D Miller. Weed seed population response to tillage, and herbicide use in three irrigated cropping sequences. Weed Sci, 1990, (38) :511 -517.
  • 3S Z Knezevic, S F Weise, C J Swanton. Interference of redroot pigweed in com. Weed Sci, 1994,42:568 - 573.
  • 4J C Prusty, B Behera, S K Mohanty. Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society. of Weed Sci2ence International Symposium. 1993, (2) :13 - 15.
  • 5李孙荣,高柱平,由振国.农田杂草防治的生态经济原理.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1998.
  • 6J W Fisk, O B Heckerman, A Shrestha, et al. Weed suppression by annuls cover crops in no - till com. Agron. J,2001,93 :3 -4.
  • 7刘建民.玉米间种绿肥作物对径流中磷含量的影响[J].水土保持应用技术,2006(4):8-10. 被引量:6

二级参考文献3

  • 1Kleinman P J A,Salon P,Shaiplcy A N,et al. Effect of cover crop established at time of corn planting on phosphorus runoff from soils before and after dairy manure application[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservatian,2005(6) :311-322.
  • 2Walter M T V K, Mehta A M, Marrone J, et al. Simple estimation of prevalence of Hortonian flow in New York City Watershed[J]. Journal of Hydrology Engineering 2003 ( 8 ) : 214 - 218.
  • 3Mehlic A. Mehlic 3 soil test extractant :A modification of Mehlic extractant[J]. Commun. scil Science Plant Analysis. 1984,15: 1409 - 1416.

共引文献6

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部