摘要
在"实质真实"视角下,刑事诉讼中法律推定的适用需要满足一定的条件,事实推定则应禁止适用。刑事推定的程序效力在于缓解证明困难和推进证明过程,实体效力在于增加了证明对象和对证明责任产生影响。
From perspective of ＂substantial truth＂, the application of legal presumption in criminal litigation needs to meet certain conditions, while fact presumption prohibits the application. The procedural effect of criminal presumption lies in lessening proof toughness and advancing proving process. The substantial effect rests with the addition of proof objects and the impact on burden of proof.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2009年第4期44-48,共5页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
刑事推定
实质真实
效力
criminal presumption
substantial truth
effect
