期刊文献+

PMTU探测算法分析与研究 被引量:5

Analyzing and Researching on Path MTU Discovery Algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数据包在网络上传输到目标站点,包长不能超过PMTU值。研究PMTU探测算法的目的是为了尽可能封装大的IP数据包,提高网络资源利用率。分析了数据报文分片机制。探讨了目前主流的PMTU探测算法,如递增法,递减法,分层探测算法的优缺点。并在此基础上提出和实现一种改进的PMTU探测算法,经过对不同站点进行测试,结果表明改进的算法发包数量较少,探测值也更精确。 Packets on the network to be transmitted to the target site, the packet length can not exceed the value of PMTU. Study of the Path MTU Discovery Method is designed to encapsulate large IP packet to improve network resource utilization. The mechanic of datagram fragmentation is analyzed. The current main PMTU discovery algorithms, such as increase algorithm, decrease algorithm, and hierarchical algorithm are researched. Based on the above algorithms an improved PMTU discovery algorithm has been proposed and implemented. After testing on various sites, the result indicates that the improved algorithm reduces the number of packets to be send and the detect PMTU value is more accurate.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 2009年第24期7395-7398,共4页 Science Technology and Engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1[1]Kent, C. and J. Mogul. Fragmentation Considered Harmful, Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '87, Stowe, VT, August 1987.
  • 2[2]Mogul, J., and S. Deering, S., Path MTU Discovery, RFC 1191, DECWRL, Stanford University, November 1990.
  • 3[3]J. Postel,The TCP Maximum Segment Size and Related Topics, RFC 879, SRI Network Information Center, November, 1983.
  • 4[4]McCann, J., Mogul, J. and S. Deering, Path MTU Discovery for IP Version 6, RFC 1981, August 1996.
  • 5[5]Conta, A. and S. Deering, ICMP for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), RFC 2463, December 1998.
  • 6[6]K. Lahey, TCP Problems with Path MTU Discovery, Internet Draft,August 1999.
  • 7W Richard Stevens. TCP/IP详解:协议.第一卷[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2000.
  • 8J Mogul. Path MTU discovery[R]. RFC 1191, 1990.
  • 9Marc Slemko. Path MTU Discovery and Filtering ICMP[EB/OL]. http://alive.znep.com/~marcs/mtu/, 1998-11.
  • 10Larry L Peterson, Bruce S Davie. 计算机网络.第二版[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2001.

共引文献10

同被引文献28

  • 1林绍太,张会汀,郑力明.IP分片重组算法(RFC815)的实现及其改进[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(4):911-913. 被引量:8
  • 2赵勇,刘江辉,杨文伟,宋静静.应用IPv6路径MTU探测时的防火墙设计[J].计算机工程,2005,31(15):216-218. 被引量:2
  • 3周海棋,杨成.IPv6与IPv4的比较[J].中国新通信,2006,8(15):17-20. 被引量:3
  • 4MeCann J, Deering S, Mogul J. RFC1981-Pat h MTU discov cry for IP version [EB/OL]. [1996-08-15]. http://www. ietf. org.
  • 5Lahey K. RFC2923-TCP problems with path MTU discovery [EB/OL]. [2000-09-17]. http://www, ietf. org.
  • 6Christenson N. Different MTUs in the network, sendmail performance tuning [ EB/OL]. [ 2004-03-05]. http://www. sendmail, org.
  • 7Malkin G, Minnear R. RFC2080-RIPng for IPv6[EB/OL].[1997-03-05] http://www, ietf. org.
  • 8Coltun R, Ferguson D, Moy J, et al. RFC5340-OSPF for IPv6[EB/OL]. [2008-10-10]. http://www, ietf. org.
  • 9Rekhter Y, Li T, Hares S, et al. RFC4271-A border gate- way protocol 4 (BGP4)[EB/OL]. E2006-05-16]. http:// www. ietL org.
  • 10Hopps C. R?C5308 Routing IPv6 with IS-IS[EB/OL]. [2008-10-10]. www. ietf. org.

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部