摘要
目的:对比全胃切除术后的肠外营养(PN)结合肠内营养(EN)与标准PN的支持效果。方法:16例患者随机分为两组,两组患者从术后d1到术后d11进行等氮、等热量营养支持。结果:(1)PN+EN组体重下降(1.2±0.22)kg,PN组体重下降(2.61±0.16)kg;(2)PN+EN组11d累积氮平衡(223.3±32.9)mg/kg,PN组11d累积氮平衡(134.6±18.5)mg/kg;(3)PN+EN组血清白蛋白下降(0.6±0.2)g/L,PN组下降(6.0+0.3)g/L;(4)PN+EN组德中谷氨酰胺下降(18±6.4)μmol/L,PN组下降(107±7.8)μmol/L;(5)PN+EN组血中C3补体下降(11±32)mg/L,PN组下降(102±62)mg/L。结论:PN结合EN较标准PN更适合于全胃切除术后的肠功能恢复特点。
Objective:To evaluate the support effects of PN (parenteral nutrition) with EN (enteral nutrition) and PN on a trial of 16 patients with total gastrectomy.Methods:All subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups of PN+EN and PN, and received iso nitrogenous, iso caloric nutritional support form POD(Post Operation Day) 1 to POD 11. Results:The weight losts was (1.2±0.22)kg in PN+EN patients where as 2.6±0.16 kg in PN group. Also PN+EN patients was superior to PN patients in cumulative nitrogen; and the following parameters were also significantly different between PN+EN and PN, as serum albumin loss was (0.6±0.2)g/L vs(6.0±0.3)g/L;serum glutamine loss was (18±6.4)μmol/L vs (107±7.8)μmol/L and serum C 3 loss was (11±32) mg/L vs(102±62)mg/L respectively ( P <0.05 ̄0.01) Conclusion:Our data indicate that PN+EN is more efficient in total gastrectomy than PN.
出处
《军医进修学院学报》
CAS
1998年第4期296-298,共3页
Academic Journal of Pla Postgraduate Medical School
关键词
肠外营养
肠内营养
胃切除
parenteral Nutrition
enteral Nutrition
total gastrectomy