期刊文献+

冠状动脉多支血管病变伴慢性肾功能不全患者血管重建策略与预后的关系 被引量:2

Association of chronic kidney disease with clinical outcomes after revascularization for patients with multiple coronary artery disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比多支血管病变伴慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的2年临床预后。方法根据改良MDRD公式对北京安贞医院2004年到2006年因多支冠状动脉病变接受药物洗脱支架(DES)或CABG的患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)进行计算,GFR<60mL/min诊断为CKD。共入选CKD患者1069例,其中724例接受DES,345例接受CABG。首要终点为2年内死亡、心肌梗死(MI)以及脑血管事件(CVE)的复合终点,次级终点为再次血管重建。结果在2年随访中,CABG组首要终点的发生率为9.9%,DES组为11.3%(P=0.528)。两组之间死亡率差异也无统计学意义(CABG组与DES组分别为3.5%比4.7%,P=0.422)。而DES组2年再次血管重建的比例显著高于CABG组(9.0%比4.1%,P=0.004)。Cox多因素回归分析表明,年龄、糖尿病、左心室功能不全(LVEF<30%)和急性冠状动脉综合征是复合终点发生的独立预测因素。结论在冠状动脉多支病变伴CKD患者中,CABG和DES两种血管重建策略显示出相同的死亡率和MI、CVE发生率。但DES组患者再次血管重建的发生率依然高于CABG组患者。 Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of CABG and PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with muhivessel coronary artery disease and CKD. Methods Between January 2004 and June 2006, 1,069 patients with multivessel corona17 disease and CKD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) ( n = 724) or CABG ( n = 345 ) were evaluated. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 〈60 mL/min, calculated using the modified MDRD equation. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) , or eerebrovascular events (CVE). The second end point was repeat revascularization. Results The cumulative incidence of 2-year composite emt points was 9. 9% in patients receiving CABG and 11.3% in those treated with DES ( P = 0. 528 ). The incidence of all-cause death was 3.5% in patients undergoing CABG and 4.7% in tbose treated with DES (P = 0. 422). However, CABG was associated with a reduced risk for repeat revascularization compared with treatment with DES (4. 1% vs. 9.0% , P = 0. 004). After muhivariate adjustment, age, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction and acute coronary syndrome were independent predictors of composite end points. Conclusion Similar incidences of death, MI or CVE were recored between CABG and DES in patients with muhivessel disease and CKD. However, the rate of repeat revascularization was higher in patients treated with DES.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2009年第6期308-312,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 肾功能不全 慢性 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 冠状动脉旁路移植术 Coronary disease Renal insufficiency chronic Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous coronary Coronary artery bypass
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, et al. Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angioplasty With Stenting Versus Coronary By pass Surgery in Patients With Multiple-Vessel Disease ( ERACI Ⅱ ) : 30-day and one-year follow-up results: ERACI Ⅱ Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,37:51-58.
  • 2Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med ,2001,344 : 1117-1124.
  • 3Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J, et al. Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME) : percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial: Inves Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001.38 : 143-149.
  • 4SoS Investigators. Coronart artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary aftery disease ( the Stent or Surgery trial) : a randomized controlled trial. Lancet,2002,360:965-970.
  • 5Mereado N, Wijus W, Serruys PW, et al. One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials. J Thorae Cardiovasc Surg, 2005,130:512-519.
  • 6Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, el al. Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary aftery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation, 2008, 117 : 2079-2086.
  • 7Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casscrly IP, et al. Propensity analysis of long-term surival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary aftery disease and high-risk features. Circulation, 2004,109:2290-2295.
  • 8Hannah EL, Racz M J, Walford G, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med, 2005,352:2174-2183.
  • 9Javaid A, Steinberg DII, Buch AN, et al. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation ,2007,116 :I200-206.
  • 10Influence of diabetes on 5-year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing CABG and PTCA in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation ( BARI ). Circulation, 1997,96 : 1761-1769.

同被引文献22

  • 1赵棋诗,赵明杰.医患沟通问题的调查与研究[D]:1-59.
  • 2Charles CA,Whelan T,Gafni A,et al. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians[J]? J Clin 0ncol,2003,21 (5):932-6.
  • 3Trevena L,Barratt A. Integrated decision making : definitions for a new discipline[J]. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003,50(3):265-8.
  • 4Stacey D,Bennett CL,Barry MJ,et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2009,8(3):CD001431.
  • 5Phelan EA,Deyo RA,Cherkin DC,et al. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program[J]. Spine,2001,26(2):206-11.
  • 6魏继红,张瑞玲.我的健康我参与[J].健康报,2012年1月3日:第005版.
  • 7Sasha Shepperd,Deborah Charnock,Bob Gann. Helping patients access high quality health information[J]. BMJ, 1999,319(18) :764-6.
  • 8Frosch,Dominick L,Kaplan Robert M. Shared Decision Making in Clinical Medicine: Past Research and Future Directions[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1999, 17(4):285-94.
  • 9Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making[J].BMJ,2011 (22):342.
  • 10魏来临,刘平,张华岩.冠心病理想治疗方式的选择[J].医学与哲学(B),2009,30(7):8-11. 被引量:11

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部