期刊文献+

个人利益与社会公共利益——关于斯密原理、布坎南公共选择理论与赫维茨机制设计理论的比较研究 被引量:20

Individual Interests and Social Public Interests——A Comparative Study on Smith Principle,Buchanan's Public Choice Theory and Hurwicz's Mechanism Design Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亚当.斯密在18世纪开创了市场经济理论体系,布坎南的公共选择理论把斯密的理论体系扩展到政治市场,而赫维茨开创的机制设计理论则对斯密理论体系给予了现代解释与证明,并在此基础上提供了弥补市场机制缺陷的机制设计方法。透过分析,我们发现这三个理论具有很强的内在关联,贯穿它们的一根主线是:试图达到个人利益与社会公共利益激励兼容。 Adam Smith lay the foundation for the market economy theory in the 18 century, Buchanan's public choice theory expanded Smith principle in political market, and Hurwizc's mechanism design theory gave Smith principle a modern interpretation and proof, proposing methods to design corresponding mechanism to remedy the defect of market mechanisms. It is found that the three theories have rigorous inherent connection: to pursue incentive-compatibility for individual interests and social public interests.
作者 钟晓敏 高琳
出处 《财经论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期19-24,共6页 Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
关键词 斯密原理 布坎南公共选择理论 机制设计理论 个人利益 社会公共利益 Smith principle Buehanan's public choice theory mechanism design theory individual interests social public interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[英]亚当·斯密,谢祖钧译.国富论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.9,295.
  • 2[英]亚当·斯密,蒋自强等译.道德情操论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.223-230.
  • 3伯烈特·史宾斯,黄进发译.诺贝尔之路:十三位经济学奖得主的故事[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,1999.201.
  • 4Buchanan J M., 1991: Constitutional Economics, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell: 42- 43.
  • 5[美]詹姆斯·M·布坎南.自由、市场和国家[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1988..
  • 6龚强.机制设计理论与中国经济的可持续发展[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2008,45(2):109-114. 被引量:9
  • 7Hurwicz L., Optimality and Informational Efficiency in Resource Allocation Processes [A]. in Arrow, Karlin S, eds, Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences [C]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1960:27 -36.
  • 8Hurwicz L., On Informationally Decentralized Systems [ A ]. in Radner and McGuire, Decision and Organization [ C ]. North Holland, Amsterdam. 1972.
  • 9Jordan, J. S., The Competitive Allocation Process in Informationally Efficient Uniquely [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982, (28) : 1 - 18.
  • 10Tian, G., A Unique Infonnationally Efficiency of the Competitive Mechanism in Production Economies, Mimeo, 2000.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Lange,Oskar.(1936):“On the Economic Theory of Socialism:Part One/Part Two” ,Review of Economic Studies,1936-37,4:1,53-71,and 4:2,123-42.
  • 2Hurwicz,L.(1960):"Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes",in Arrow,Karlin and Suppes (eds.),Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences.Stanford University Press.
  • 3Hurwicz,L.(1972):"On informationally decentralized systems",in Radner and McGuire,Decision and Organization.NorthHolland,Amsterdam.
  • 4Akerlof,G.(1970):“The Market for Lemons:Quality Uncertainty and the Market mechanism”,Quarterly Journal of Economics 89,488-500.
  • 5Spence,A.M.(1973):"Job Market Signaling",Quarterly Journal of Economics 87,355-74.
  • 6Rothschild,M.,and J.E.Stiglitz.(1976):“Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Market:An Essay in the Economics of Imperfect Information”,Quarterly Journal of Economics 80,629-49.
  • 7Gibbard,A.(1973):“Manipulation of voting schemes:a general result”,Econometrica 41,587-602.
  • 8Green,J.and J.J.Laffont (1979):Incentives in Public Decision Making.NorthHolland,Amsterdam.
  • 9Dasgupta,P.,P.Hammond and E.Maskin.(1979):“The implementation of social choice rules:some general results on incentive compatibility”,Review of Economic Studies 46,181-216.
  • 10Myerson,R.(1979):"Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem",Econometrica 47,61-73.

共引文献22

同被引文献200

引证文献20

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部