期刊文献+

宪法哲学的方法论研究 被引量:1

A Study of Constitutional Philosophy Methodology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检视当下宪法学的研究成果,其方法论研究的空乏可窥见一斑。首先,学界侧重于对具体研究方法的探讨,而没有深入地研究关于方法的一般理论;其次,对方法论和具体的研究方法不加区分,在概念使用上界域模糊;再次,没有形成逻辑严密、构架科学、层次分明的方法论体系。为此,加强宪法哲学的方法论研究,明晰其研究对象、性质及功用,建构其科学体系,增强其实践理性,预见其发展走向,对澄清当下方法论研究中的困惑有着积极的指导意义。 An examination of constitutional philosophy research reveals the lack of methodology study, which is due to the fact that the academia firstly pays attention to the exploration of concrete methods other than makes profound study of general methodological theories, secondly makes no distinction between methodology and concrete methods and thus confuses their concepts in use, and thirdly fails to establish a methodology of close logic, scientific structure and clear coherence. It follows that it is of instructive significance in clarifying the confusion of the methodology study to enhance constitutional philosophy methodology study, clarify its objects, nature and function, form its scientific system, reinforce its practical rationality and predict the tendency of its development.
作者 付恒
出处 《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期5-12,共8页 Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 宪法哲学的方法论 体系构建 实践价值 constitutional philosophy methodology system formation practical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献125

共引文献133

同被引文献5

  • 1A.John Simnons.Justification and Legitimacy:Right and Duty[M].New York:Cambridge University Press.2001.
  • 2Rebert Nozick.Anarchy,Nation and Utopia[M].New York:Basic Documents.1974.
  • 3John Rawls.A Theory of Justice[M].Belknap Press of Hardard University Press.1971:112.
  • 4John Rawls.Lagal and Duty in the Princlple of Fair Play[M].1971:17.
  • 5陈驰.宪法正当性的正当化过程[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009,36(3):15-21. 被引量:3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部