加害给付的重新阐释

Reinterpretation of Injurious Fulfillment

违约责任和侵权责任竞合的最典型表现就是加害给付,而传统做法是选择一种请求权来加以解决。但有其不合理和显失公平之处。尤其是当固有利益损害涉及到精神损害赔偿时,如何在加害给付中正确体现全面赔偿原则是一个有争议的问题。单纯运用侵权责任和违约责任都无法做到全面赔偿。所以在违约责任中扩大保护范围,在特定案例中考虑精神损害赔偿的采用,是一个需要在理论和实务中加以重新阐释和重视的问题。

The coincidence of liability for breach and liability for tort is the typical of Injurious fulfillment, which is dealt with through the choice of one claim in traditional practice. Through analysis, it is easy to find the practice unreasonable and unfair. In particular, when spiritual damage is involved in inherent interest damage, how to correctly embody full damage in the injurious fulfillment is a controversial question. Neither liability for breach or liability for tort can fulfill full damage. So the scope of protection in the liability for breach should be enlarged. Whether in particular cases spiritual damage should be taken into consideration is worth illustrating and noticing in both legal theory and practice.