期刊文献+

阴道镜下宫颈活检的应用价值评价 被引量:1

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Evaluate the Clinical Value of Colposcopic Cervical Biopsies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨阴道镜下宫颈活检的临床价值。方法:2005年9月—2008年9月,256例经阴道镜下宫颈活检并实施高频电波刀电圈切除术(LEEP术),其中上皮内瘤变(CIN)186例,宫颈炎70例,所有标本送病理检查,比较分析LEEP术前、后病理诊断及相关因素。结果:以宫颈锥切诊断为准,则阴道镜检查诊断宫颈疾病符合率为88.3%(226/256),其中宫颈炎97.1%(68/70),宫颈CIN分级诊断符合率准确性56.5%(105/186)。以锥切前后复核病理诊断为准,则阴道镜检查诊断宫颈疾病的准确率为97%,诊断宫颈癌及其CIN的准确性为87.1%(162/186)。结论:阴道镜下宫颈多点活检早期诊断宫颈癌及CIN具有极高的准确性,是宫颈癌三阶梯筛查的关键步骤,宜在临床广泛推广使用。 Objective:To asses the clinical value of colposcopic cervical biopsies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out in 256 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)( 186 cases) and eervicitis (70 cases) undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsies Loop electrosurgical excision procedure between September 2005 and September 2008,all the specimens undergoing pathology. Compare the pathologic diagnosis and relative factors of colposcopic cervical biopsies and t.eep. Results: The cornincidence rate of multiple biopsies before the procedures comparing with the conization ones was 88.3 % (226/256), eervicitis 97. 1% (68/70), CIN56.5% (105/186). Conclusion: Colposcopic cervica multiple biopsies have high coincidence rate to diagnose CIN and cervical carcinoma,that is the key step for diagnosing cervical carcinoma . It can be widely used in clinic.
出处 《中国临床医学》 2009年第6期932-933,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 阴道镜 宫颈活检 高频电波刀电圈切除术 Colposcopy Cervical biopsies Loop electrosurgical excision procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1Fambrini M, Penna C, Fallani MG, et al. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of biopsy. Inter J Gynecol Obstet,2003,82:219-220.
  • 2Barker B, Gareia F, Lozevski J, et al. The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncolk,2001,82 :22-26.
  • 3Massad LS, Halperin CJ, Bitterman P. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. Gynecol Oncol, 1996,60:400-403.
  • 4Wright TC, Cox T, Massad LS, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003,189:295 -304.
  • 5Costa S, Nuzzo MD, Rubino A, et al. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix.Gynecol Oncol,2003 ,90 :57-63.
  • 6Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 1993,12 : 186-192.
  • 7Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study. JAMA,2001,285 : 1500-1505.
  • 8Tarwrieyi F. Perceptions and barriers to cenical cancer screening in a rural district of mutoko: Mashonaland East Province. Zimbabwe[J].Cent Afr J Med, 2005,51(11-12) :120 -122.
  • 9LiusA SaliimE.新柏氏方法应用在新格兰独立实验室和门诊筛查人群的研究.Archines of Pathology and Laharatory Medicine,1999,(9):28-28.
  • 10Limaye A, Connor AJ, Huang X, et al. The comparison and analysis between traditional smear and membrane fluid based thin layer method [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2003,127 (2) :200-204.

共引文献118

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部