期刊文献+

非形式逻辑视野下的因明性质探析 被引量:1

Investigation on the Property of Hetuvidya in Horizon of Non-classical Logic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在因明的性质这一问题上,学界存在两种针锋相对的观点。一种观点认为,因明就是逻辑,另一种观点则对此坚决予以否认。其实,后者是从狭隘的形式逻辑的角度立论的。如果从其论证方式与论证结构来详细考察,因明是一种典型的非形式逻辑。 There are two diametrically opposed views on the property of Hetuvidya. One holds that Hetuvidya is logic, the other denies it resolutely. In fact, the latter just put forward its opinion from the narrow pointview of formal logic. By studying carefully its patterns and structures of argumentation, we find out that Hetuvidya is a typical informal logic.
作者 张汉生 庄明
出处 《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2009年第4期127-130,共4页 Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金 2007年河北省社科基金项目"汉传因明史论"(HB07BZX003)
关键词 非形式逻辑 因明 探析 Non-classical Logic Hemvidya investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1熊明辉.语用论辩术——一种批判性思维视角[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,9(1):41-46. 被引量:20
  • 2Benjamin J. , 1997, "The roots of informal logic in Plato", in Douglas Walton and Alan Brinton(eds. ) , Historical Foundations o flnJbrmal Logic, Ashgate Publishing Ltd..
  • 3Benson, H. , 1990, "Meno, the slave boy and the elenchos", in Phronesis, vol. 35.
  • 4Fasko, Daniel, Jr., 2003, “Critical thinking: origins, historical development, future directions”, in Daniel Fasko, Jr. (ed.), Critical Thinking and Reasoning: Current Research, Theory and Practice, Hamptom Press, Inc..
  • 5Hamblin, Charles, 1970, Fallacies, London : Metheun.
  • 6Walton. D. , 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press.
  • 7Walton. D. ,1996a, Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory, University of Toronto Press.
  • 8Walton. D. ,1996b, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 9Walton. D. ,1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press.
  • 10Sartor, Giovanni, A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation, obtained from the author, 2005.

共引文献30

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部