摘要
规范性文件备案审查机制面临有限资源无法充分满足日益增长需求的瓶颈。我国法律对规范性文件的审查程序有具体的规定,但审查建议的受理缺乏较为明确的标准和程序。美国最高法院和德国联邦宪法法院在规范性文件审查的制度实践中,形成了一套遴选机制,起到了一定的效果,值得我国借鉴。我国应明确规范性文件审查的功能定位,形成规范性文件审查建议的遴选标准,细化规范性文件审查建议的遴选程序,增加规范性文件审查建议遴选的透明度,以完善规范性文件审查建议的遴选机制。
The recording and examination mechanism of standardized document is facing the bottle-neck problem in which the limited resources fail to fully satisfy the ever-increasing demand. China allows concrete specifications for the procedure of the examination, but lacks clarity in the standard and procedure for the hearing and reception of relevant proposals. The American Supreme Court and German Federal Constitutional Court have formed a set of selection system ,with positive effects in the practice of examination system for standardized documents, worthy of being adopted for refercnee. In order to perfect the selection mechanism of examination proposal for standardized document, China must specify the functional position of standardized documentation examination, formulate selection standard for examination proposals, clarify the selection procedure, and strengthen the transparency of auditing, proposing and selecting system of standardized documents.
出处
《长沙理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第4期48-54,共7页
Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology：Social Science
关键词
规范性文件
审查
审查建议
遴选机制
standardized document
examine
examination proposal
selection mechanism
