2Borman, W.C.,and Motowidlo, S.J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organization. San Francisco, CA :Jossey Bass, 1993:71-85.
3Van Scotter, J. R., and terpersonal facilitation and separate facets of contextual Motowidlo, S. J. Injob dedication as performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,(81).
4Conway, J. M. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,(1):3.
5LePine J A. and Dyne L V. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86(2):326.
9Zheng-Xue Luo, Kan Shi, Wen-Dong Li and Dan-Min Miao. Construct of job performance: Evidence from Chinese military soldiers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2008,11(3):222.
2[1]Marsh H W, Dunkin M J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In: Smart. Journal Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon, 1992.
3[3]Borman W C, Motowidlo S J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman W C. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1993,71 - 98.
4[4]Flanagan J C. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, (51) ,327 - 358.
5Borman, W. C and Motowidlo, S. J. Expanding the CriterionDomain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance[C]. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eels),Personnel Se-lection in Organizations (pp. 71 - 98 ). San Francisco:Jossey- Bass. 1993.
6Coleman, V. I, and Borman, W. C. Investigating the under-lying structure of the citizenship performance domain [J ].Human Resource Management Review, 2000,10:25 - 44.
7Rotundo, M. and Sackett. P. R. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance toglobal ratings of job performance [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87: 66 - 80.
8Arvey, R. D. & Murphy, K. R. Performance evaluation in work setting [ J ]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998,49:141 - 168.
9Conway, J. M. Distinguish contextual performance from task performance for mangagerial jobs [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84 : 3 - 13.
10Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. The Social psychology of organizations (2nd Ed. )[M]. New York:Wiley. 1978.
9Borma W C, Motowidlo S J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance personnel se- lection in organization [M]. San francisco, CA: jossey bass,1993.
10Lewin K. Group dynamics., research and theory[M]. New York:Peterson and company, 1953.
