共识的构建:恐怖主义分析路径之选择

The Building of Consensus: Different Choices of Analysing Terrorism

进行反恐怖主义研究必须弄清楚恐怖主义的基本范畴,这些基本范畴包括恐怖主义的正当性和概念界定,然而实际情况却是问题丛生。恐怖主义的正当性问题是一个价值判断问题,不同的评价主体由于所处位置及论说语境不同,会作出截然不同的判断。而恐怖主义的概念界定差异则是由不同学科的定义重点不同所导致的,其定义的主要方法包括政治学、语义学和法律学三种方法。关于恐怖主义基本范畴的分析,最终目的还是要归于问题本身的解决。在具体分析恐怖主义时,人们一般习惯于套用"文明冲突论"或"现代性"的范式。这两种理论都有其依据,也有其缺陷,而沟通理性在此之外提供了一条新路径。

Basic concepts of terrorism should be understood to better fight against it. The legitimacy of terrorism is closely related to different value criterion. Different subjects value it differently. The differences in the concepts of terrorism are caused by the different focuses in different disciplines. Models of ＂ culture conflict＂ and ＂modern style＂ are often applied in analyzing terrorism. Both theories have its merits and defects. Communicative rationality provides a new path for the analysis of terrorism.