摘要
This article discusses the meaning of the under-determination thesis raised by the scientific anti-realists,and takes the under-determinative problems in space-time theories and the reply of space-time realists for examples,analyzes deeply the new features of the defense to scientific realism.All these work are based on the semantical analysis,epistemological analysis and the ontological analysis of scientific realism.It indicates that the existence of under-determination thesis has certain grounds,and realists are trying to give a reasonable reply so that they can get out of dilemma of traditional scientific realism.This kind of reply has the feature of contextual realism.
This article discusses the meaning of the under-determination thesis raised by the scientific anti-realists,and takes the under-determinative problems in space-time theories and the reply of space-time realists for examples,analyzes deeply the new features of the defense to scientific realism.All these work are based on the semantical analysis,epistemological analysis and the ontological analysis of scientific realism.It indicates that the existence of under-determination thesis has certain grounds,and realists are trying to give a reasonable reply so that they can get out of dilemma of traditional scientific realism.This kind of reply has the feature of contextual realism.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期99-106,共8页
Philosophical Research
基金
国家社会科学规划基金项目"语义分析方法与当代科学哲学的发展"(编号08BZX022)
国家社会科学青年基金项目"量子引力与当代物理学时空哲学研究"(编号09CZX012)
山西省回国留学人员科研项目"‘洞问题’与当代时空实在论研究"成果