期刊文献+

产品市场竞争、公司治理与信息披露质量 被引量:423

The Market Competition in Products,the Corporate Governance and the Quality of Information Disclosure
原文传递
导出
摘要 信息披露质量是保护投资者利益、维持资本市场健康发展的关键要素。本文以2003~2005年深交所上市公司数据,考察了产品市场竞争、公司治理与信息披露质量之间的关系。研究结果表明,公司治理结构的合理安排能够对信息披露产生促进作用,而产品市场竞争则对某些公司治理机制产生了互补或替代的作用。这一结论意味着,在中国当前的制度背景下,要提升信息披露质量、保护投资者利益,有必要继续完善上市公司的治理结构;与此同时,在中国公司治理整体上存在诸多问题、而相应改革进展缓慢这一既定的前提下,通过降低进入壁垒等方式加强产品市场竞争,也可以有效提升公司的信息披露质量。 The quality of information disclosure is the key factor that protects investors' interests and that maintains the healthy development of capital markets.Based on the data,from 2003 to 2005,on the companies listed on Shenzhen Securities Exchange,we have,in this article,explored the relationship between the market competition,the corporate governance,and the information disclosure.The results of our study show that the reasonable arrangements for the structure of corporate governance can promote the information disclosure, and the market competition in products plays the role of mutual complement or substitution in terms of the governance mechanism of certain companies.This conclusion implies that,in the context of China's present system,in order to upgrade the quality of information disclosure and protect investors' interests, it is necessary to continue the perfection of the governance structure of listed companies,that there exist many problems in the governance,as a whole,of China's listed companies,and that,in the given context of the slow progress of the related reform,to lower the barrier to entry or to use other means to strengthen the competition of product markets can also effectively boost the quality of listed companies' information disclosure.
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期133-141,161,共10页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:70972129 70972130)的阶段性研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Abbott, L. J., Parker, S. and Peters, G. F., 2000, "The Effectiveness of Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations in Mitigating Financial Misstatements: An Empirical Study", www.ssrn.com.
  • 2Alchian, A., 1950, "Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory", Journal of Political Economy, 58 (1), pp.211 - 221.
  • 3Allison, P., 1999, "Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups", Sociological Methods and Research, 28 (11), pp.186-208.
  • 4Ball, R., Robin, A. and Wu, J. S., 2003, "Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 ( 13), pp.235-270.
  • 5Beasley, M. S., 1996, "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud", The Accounting Review, 71 (4), pp.443-465.
  • 6Bushee, B. J. and Noe, C. F., 2000, "Corporate Disclosure Practices, Institutional Investors, and Stock Return Volatility", Journal of Accounting Research, 38 (Supplemental), pp. 171-202.
  • 7Chau, G. K. and Gray, S. J., 2002, "Ownership Structure and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore", The International Journal of Accounting, 37 (2), pp.247- 265.
  • 8Chen, C. J. P. and Jaggi, B., 2000, "Association between Independent Non-Executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19 (4,5),pp.285-310.
  • 9Deangelo, L. E., 1981, "Auditor Size and Audit Quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (3), pp. 183- 199.
  • 10Grosfeld, I. and Tressel, T., 2002, "Competition and Ownership Structure: Substitutes Complements? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange", Economics of Transition, 10 (3), pp.525-551.

二级参考文献136

共引文献2076

同被引文献5758

引证文献423

二级引证文献4875

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部