期刊文献+

功能独立性评测的信度与效度的初步研究 被引量:22

Preliminary Study on Reliability and Efficacy of Functional Independence Measure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在本国的文化背景下,研究功能独立性评测(functionalindependencemeasure,FIM)的重测信度与构想效度。方法使用FIM、Barthelindex(BI)、PULSESADL功能评定量表(PULSES)、运动评估量表(motorasesmentscale,MAS)、残疾分级量表(disabilityratingscale,DRS),对68例患者(脑卒中33例、脑外伤30例、脊髓损伤5例)的残疾进行评定,对18例患者(脑卒中6例、脑外伤7例、脊髓损伤5例)使用FIM作了重复测定,同时收集相关资料如年龄、合并症、性别等。结果FIM的重测信度高(r>0.96,P<0.05)。FIM与BI、MAS、PULSES高度相关(P<0.05),与DRS无关(P>0.05)。结论在我国的文化背景下FIM的重测信度与构想效度高,可以在我国推广使用。 Objective To study the test retest reliability and construct efficacy under the country's background.Methods 68 disable patients (33 cases of strokes,30 cases of traumatic brain injury,5 cases of spinal cord injury) were investigated using the FIM,barthel index(BI),PULSES,motor assessment scale(MAS) and disability rating scale(DRS).18 patients (6 cases of stroke,7 cases of traumatic brain injury,5 cases of spinal cord injury) were reassessed by FIM after a short period (3 days interval).Age,sex,comorbidity of the patients and so on were also collected.Results The test retest reliability of the FIM was high(r> 0.96 ,P< 0.05 ).The relationship between FIM and BI,PULSES was significant(P< 0.05 ),the relationship between FIM and DRS was of no significance(P> 0.05 ).Conclusion FIM has high test retest reliability and construct validity and can be widely used in China.
出处 《中华物理医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 1998年第3期171-174,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 功能独立性评测 重测信度 构想效度 医学康复 functional independence measure test retest reliability construct validity disability rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

同被引文献254

引证文献22

二级引证文献246

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部