期刊文献+

法律决策中的后见偏差 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在法庭审判中的陪审员面临着一个艰难的挑战,他们必须忽略结果的影响,以一种公平的方式判决被告在结果出现之前的行为是否有罪。在尝试着去忽略特定信息的同时,这种重新判断过去的方式使得陪审员脆弱于后见偏差。国外的一些研究已经开始论证后见偏差对于法律决策的有害影响。除了承认后见效应这一现象在庭审中的普遍存在外,在法律实践中也需要尝试着减少甚至消除庭审中的后见偏差。
作者 彭慰慰
出处 《长沙大学学报》 2010年第1期57-59,共3页 Journal of Changsha University
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hartmut B, Jochen M, Rudiger F P. Hindsight Bias: On Being Wise After the Event[J]. Social Cognition, 2007, ( 1 ).
  • 2Hawkins S, Hastie R. Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events After the Outcomes are Known[ J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, (107).
  • 3Casper J D, Benedict K, Perry J L. Juror Decision Making, Attitudes, and the Hindsight Bias [J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1989, (3).
  • 4Kamin K A, Rachlinski J J. Ex Post not = ex ante: Determining Liability in Hindsight[J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1995, (19).
  • 5Hastie R, Schkade D A, Payne J W. Juror Judgments in Civil Cases : Hindsight Effects on Judgments of Liability for Punitive Damage [J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1999,(5).
  • 6Casper J D, Benedict K, Kelly J R. Cognitions, Attitudes, and Decision - making in Search and Seizure Cases[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1998, (2).
  • 7Bomstein B. From Compassion to Compensation : The Effect of Injury Severity on Mock Juror' Liability Judgments [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1998, (16).
  • 8Greene E, Johns M, Bowman J. The Effects of Injury Severity on Jury Negligence Decision [J]. Law and Human Behavior, 1999, (6).
  • 9Blandon R J, Desroches C M, Brodie M, et al. Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical Errors [ J ]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002, (347).
  • 10Harley E M, Carlsen K A, Loft'us G R. The "saw - it - all - along" effect: Demonstrations of Visual Hindsight Bias [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004,(5).

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部