期刊文献+

双边税收协定与CFC税制关系探讨——兼谈《中华人民共和国企业所得税法》第58条 被引量:1

An Analysis of the Relation between Bilateral Tax Treaty and the CFC Regime
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期以来,双边税收协定与CFC税制关系问题存在争议。一般认为,受控外国公司税制作为一种重要的反避税措施,它与双边税收协定是兼容的。但是,从一些欧盟国家的实践来看,观点并非一致。由于《中华人民共和国企业所得税法》中规定了该项税制,因此,解决两者的兼容性也是将要面临的问题。在我国《宪法》没有对条约在国内法中地位进行规定之前,《中华人民共和国企业所得税法》第58条应予以完善。 For a long time, the relationship between bilateral tax treaties and the Controlled Foreign Company regime has been controversial. It is generally believed that the Controlled Foreign Company regime is an important anti-avoidance measure. However, whether it is compatibility with tax treaties or not is an important issue. The 2003 OECD Model Commentaries emphasize that they are compatible. At the same time, from the practice of the European Union, the view is not unanimous. At present, pie' s Repulic of China, China competence authority has according to the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the Peoadopted the Controlled Foreign Company regime to regulate the deferral or evasion of taxation. The compatibility of them should be faced with the problem. However, the article 58 should be perfect before the treaty is incorporated into the Constitution in domestic law system.
作者 张卫彬
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期107-112,共6页 Taxation and Economy
关键词 税收协定 受控外国公司 兼容性 企业所得税法 tax treaty controlled foreign company compatibility enterprise income tax law
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Victor Thuronyi. Comparative Tax Law [ M ] : New York : Kluwer Law International,2003 : 112 - 113.
  • 2Richard L. Doernberg. International Taxation [ M ]. New York : West Publishing Co. , 1989 ;77.
  • 3Sol Picciotto. International Business Taxation [ M ]. London : Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1992:325 - 332.
  • 4Roy Rohatgi. Basic International Taxation [ M ]. New York : Kluwer Law International,2002:40.
  • 5Brian J. Arnold, Michael J. Mc lntyre. International Tax Primer[ M ]. New York : Kluwer Law International, 1995:98.
  • 6Arnold Duncan McNair. The Law of Treaties : British Practice and Opinions [ M ]. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1938 : 100.
  • 7Xavier Oberson, Howard R. Hull. Switzerland in International Tax Law[ M ]. Amsterdam:IBFD Publications, 1996 : 146.
  • 8罗伊·罗哈吉.国际税收基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.374-377.
  • 9Micbael Lang. CFC Legislation, Tax Treaties and EC Law[ M ]. New York:Kluwer Law International, 2004:52.
  • 10Sara Andersson. CFC Rules and Double Tax Treaties [ D ]. Jonkoping University, Jonkoping International Business School, 2006 : 26.

共引文献4

同被引文献16

  • 1REIMER,EKKEHART.Tax Treaty Interpretation in Germany[J].European Taxation,1999,39(12):460.
  • 2SANDLER,DANIEL.Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation:Pushing the Boundaries:2[M].TheHague/London/Boston:Kluwer Law International,1998:68.
  • 3SMITH,T.ROBERT.Tax Treaty Interpretation by the Judiciary[J].Tax Lawyer,1996,49(4):850.
  • 4AVERY JONES,JOHN F.The Interpretation of Tax Treaties with Particular Reference to Art.3(2)of the OECD Model[J].British Tax Review,1984:18-19.
  • 5VOGEL,KLAUS.On Double Taxation Conventions:3[M].London/the Hague/Boston:Kluwer Law International,1997:209.
  • 6SHANNON,H.A.United States Income Tax Treaties:Reference to Domestic Law for the Meaning of Undefined Terms[J].Intertax,1989,17(11):453.
  • 7AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE(ALI).Federal Income Tax Project—International Aspects of United States Income Taxa-tion II[R].Philadelphia:The American Law Institute,1992:27.
  • 8BRUGGEN,EDWIN VAN DER.Unless the Vienna Convention Otherwise Requires:Notes on the Relationship betweenArticle 3(2)of the OECD Model Tax Convention and Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties[J].Eu-ropean Taxation,2003,43(5):142-156.
  • 9CALDERN,JOSM.,PIA,M.DOLORES.Spain:Interpretation of Tax Treaties[J].European Taxation,1999,39(10):377.
  • 10Applicant A v.Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs(1997)190 CLR 225:230-231.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部