期刊文献+

考虑属性关联的TOPSIS语言群决策方法 被引量:3

New TOPSIS Linguistic Group Decision Making Method Considering Interactions between Attributes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对在实际的多属性语言群决策问题中属性之间往往具有相互关联作用这一问题,提出了一种考虑属性关联的TOPSIS语言群决策方法.该方法中决策者给出对方案的语言评价信息,并采用二元语义概念对语言评价信息进行处理.在传统理想点法的基础上引入λ模糊测度的概念,根据属性间的关联作用确定每个方案属性的权重并得到加权决策矩阵.然后计算每个方案与正、负理想点间在n维二元语义空间内的二元语义欧氏距离并得到相对贴近度,确定最优方案.该方法有效地避免了决策过程中语言评价信息的扭曲和损失,并能够考虑属性间的关联作用对于属性权重的影响,使得决策结果更加合理可信.通过一个实例验证了方法的有效性和实用性. Interactions often exist between some attributes in multi-attribute linguistic group decision making. To solve this problem, a new TOPSIS linguistic group decision making method was proposed. In this method, decision makers give linguistic assessment information to different alternatives, and the two- tuple linguistic representation is used to aggregate the linguistic assessment information. The concept of λ fuzzy measures is introduced to the traditional TOPSIS method to describe the interactions between attributes. For each alternative, the weights of attributes are determined by considering the influence of interactions between them. Then weighted decision making matrix is obtained, and the two-tuple linguistic eu- clidean distance between each alternative and positive/negative ideal solution is calculated. Then the rela- tive closeness coefficients can be obtained, and the optimal alternative can be determined. The new method not only avoids information distortion and loss which occur formerly in the linguistic information processing, but also considers the influence of interactions between attributes on their weights. Consequently, more reasonable results can be obtained on the basis of this algorithm. An example was given to validate the proposed method.
出处 《湖南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期49-53,共5页 Journal of Hunan University:Natural Sciences
基金 武器装备重点预研基金资助项目(9140A04010106KG01)
关键词 多属性群决策 二元语义 λ模糊测度 TOPSIS法 multi-attribute group decision making two-tuple linguistic λ-fuzzy measures TOPSIS method
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1BORDOGNA G, FEDRIZZI M, PASI G. A linguistic model ing of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 1997, 27 (1):126--132.
  • 2WANG R C, CHUU S J. Group decision making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufac turing system[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154:563--572.
  • 3XU Z S. A method based on liguistic aggregation operators for decision making with linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166 : 19-30.
  • 4HERRERA F, HERRERA--VIEDMA E, LUIS Martinez. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114:43--58.
  • 5HERRERA F, MATINEZ L. A 2 tuple fuzzy linguistic repre sentation model fur computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8 (12):746--752.
  • 6HERRERA F, MATINEZ L. A model based on linguistic 2 tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi expert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics -Part B: Cybernetics, 2001, 31 (2):227--234.
  • 7王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5. 被引量:70
  • 8卫贵武,林锐.基于二元语义多属性群决策的灰色关联分析法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(9):1686-1689. 被引量:27
  • 9LIU P D. A novel method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making[J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2009, doi: 10. 1016/j. knosys. 2009.02. 001.
  • 10章玲,周德群.基于关联的多属性决策分析理论研究综述[J].管理评论,2008,20(5):51-57. 被引量:15

二级参考文献43

共引文献110

同被引文献33

  • 1邵立南,刘志斌.遗传神经网络模型在地下水质量评价中的应用[J].露天采矿技术,2005,20(4):20-22. 被引量:2
  • 2董东林,武强,钱增江,谢海澜,吴光先,毕岑岑,吕镇歧.榆神府矿区水环境评价模型[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(6):776-780. 被引量:15
  • 3徐伟华,张文修.基于优势关系下信息系统分配约简的矩阵算法[J].计算机工程,2007,33(14):4-7. 被引量:11
  • 4邱蔻华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
  • 5张堃,周德云.基于熵的TOPSIS法空战多目标威胁评估[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(9):1493-1495. 被引量:50
  • 6XU Z S. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for decision making with linguistic prefer- ence relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004 (166) : 19-30.
  • 7Lee H L, Billington C. The evolution of supply-chain- management models and practice at Hewlett-Packard [J]. Interfaces, 1995,25 (5) :41-62.
  • 8Griliches Z. New development in productivity meas- urement analysis: NBER studies in income and wealth[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 9Flanagan R, L-Weisheng, Shen Liyin, et al. Compet- itiveness in construction., a oritical review of re- search[D]. Construction Management and Econom- ics,2007(25) :991.
  • 10Song Honggna,Duan Zhenwei.Comprehension evaluation forthe safety of mining ventilation system based on the TOPSIS. Mine Hazards Prevention and Control Technology . 2005

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部