期刊文献+

国际刑事责任的多元主体及其启示——以国际刑事责任原则的崭新进展为视角 被引量:1

Multi-holders of International Criminal Liability and Its Revelation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际刑事审判的展开与国际法律文件的增加,直接推动了国际刑事责任原则的日益丰富和深化。尤其是新近的审判实践,使国际刑事责任的主体呈现出多元并存的变化特点,该原则的责任模式也从个人型转向多元主体型。国际刑事责任主体多元化的发展趋势不可逆转,但其进程取决于国际刑事责任主体的内生力量与外部环境之综合作用。探讨国际刑事责任多元主体的未来发展,对于审视国际刑法的体系完善、犯罪惩治及其与国内刑法的关系衔接有一定的裨益与启迪。 Development of international criminal adjudicative activities and increase of international legal papers directly contributes to enrichment and sophistication of principles of international criminal liabilities. Recent trial practice, especially , has yielded poly-holders of international criminal liability and made the liability mode changed from individual mode to multi-holder one, which indicates that pluralization is inevitable. However, the diversification process heavily depends on the comprehensive effectiveness of both internal strength of international liability holders and external environment. So, to study the future of multi-holders is not only conducive to but also has revelation of improvement of the international criminal law regime, punishment of crimes and coordination of international and domestic criminal laws.
作者 蒋娜
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期170-178,共9页 Modern Law Science
关键词 国际刑事责任 多元主体 基本原则 崭新进展 启示 international criminal liability poly-subject basic principle new development revelation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1谢里夫·巴西奥尼.国际刑法导论[M].赵秉志,王文华,译.北京:法律出版社,2006:76.
  • 2蒋娜.国际刑法基本原则的新进展[J].刑法论丛,2009(3):463-477. 被引量:3
  • 3高铭暄,王秀梅.当代国际刑法的新发展[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2006,24(2):75-82. 被引量:10
  • 4刘大群.国际法上的国家刑事责任问题[J].刑事法评论,2007(2):604-631. 被引量:5
  • 5Mohamed Elewa Badar & Nora Karsten. Current Developments at the International Criminal Tribunals [ J ]. International Criminal Law Review, 2007, (2) : 10 - 11.
  • 6The ICTY. Prosecutor v. Milomir Staki?. Case No. IT -97 - 24 - R( Stakic Appeal Judgment) [ DB/OL]. ICTY Judgment List. 2006 - 03 - 22/2008 - 10 - 01.
  • 7The ICTR. Simic Appeal Judgment [ DB/OL ]. ICTR Judgment Hst. 2006 - 11 - 28/2008 - 10 - 01.
  • 8the ICTR. Gacumbitsi Appeal Judgment [ DB/OL]. ICTR Judgment List. 2006 - 07 - 07/2008 - 10 - 01.
  • 9The ICTY. Prosecutor v. Naser Oric. Case No. IT - 03 - 68 - T ( Oric Trial Judgment) [ DB/OL]. ICTY Judgment List. 2006 - 03 - 22/2008 - 10 - 01.
  • 10The ICTY. Prosecutor v. Boskoski and Tarculovski. Case No. IT - 04 - 82 - PT. ( Boskoski Decision) [ DB/OL]. ICTY Judgment List. 2006 - 05 - 26/2008 - 10 - 01.

二级参考文献40

  • 1张旭,徐岱.罪刑法定与国际刑法──兼论国际刑法的基本原则[J].法制与社会发展,1998,4(5):47-53. 被引量:12
  • 2范红旗.国际反腐败公约中的法人犯罪——兼论国际刑法中的法人犯罪及责任模式[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2006,23(2):107-112. 被引量:4
  • 3张智辉.国际刑法通论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999..
  • 4Farhad Malekian,"The Monopolization of International Criminal Law in the United Nations:A Jurisprudential Approach",Uppsala University Reprocentralen HSC,Sweden,1995.
  • 5Gerhard O.W.Mueller & Edward M.Wise eds.,"International Criminal Law" at 5-12,1965.
  • 6M.Cherif Bassiouni,"International Criminal Law",Martinus Nijihoff Publishers,The Natherlands,1980.
  • 7M.Cherif Bassiouni:"From Versailles to Rwanda in Seventy-five Years:The Need to Establish a Permanent International Criminal Court" at "Harvard Human Rights Journal",Volume Ten,Spring 1997.
  • 8M.Cherif Bassiouni,"The Time Has Come for an International Criminal Court",at "Indiana International and Comparative Law Review",Spring 1991.
  • 9M.Cherif Bassiouni:"Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law",Published by Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,Netherlands 1992.
  • 10Bruce Broomhall:"The International Criminal Court:Overview,and Cooperation with States",at A.I.D.P.《NOUVELLES ETUDES PENALES》,1999,13.

共引文献21

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部